Review: Rachel Weisz shines as lawyer proving Holocaust happened in Denial
- Credit: Archant
The Oscar-winning actress stars in this true story as Deborah Lipstadt, involved in libel battle with British 'historian' David Irving.
This is a film about Holocaust denial denial.
When Jewish American academic Deborah Lipstadt (Rachel Weisz) writes that British 'historian' David Irving (Timothy Spall) says that the Holocaust never happened, he sues her for libel because he says it is not fair for her to say he said it never happened, even though he did say it never happened, because she says the evidence he used to say it never happened wasn't valid, and he says it was and that he is a proper historian, which she says he isn't. And because he sued her in a British court, she, or rather her expensive legal team, have to prove that the Holocaust did happen.
You may also want to watch:
Based on a true story, a courtroom drama, an underdog tale, about the Holocaust, Denial would appear to have a full house in any hand of Oscar pleading, but David Hare's script inverts every awards season convention.
It's an odd recommendation, but what I like about this film is that there isn't a likeable major character in it.
- 1 Work started on four new homes without permission
- 2 Woman has heart attack and dies in ambulance waiting for a hospital bed
- 3 Murder investigation launched after body of man found in Norwich flat
- 4 Flight bound for Norwich turns back to Aberdeen
- 5 Jets heard roaring over Norwich for training exercise
- 6 Christmas craft, food and gift fair returning to Norfolk estate
- 7 Holt Hall for sale after years of uncertainty
- 8 Man who died after a medical episode in Hopton identified
- 9 Banham Zoo welcomes birth of two tiger cubs
- 10 Who can get a Covid booster jab and how can I book one?
The plucky underdog single handedly facing down the oppressive might of the establishment is a stuck-up Holocaust denier. The good guys are pampered, patronising, snooty lawyers who like to drink rather excellent reds from plastic cups.
Spall, now dramatically slimmed down, makes a magnificent gargoyle of Irving, giving him the pained but somehow smug expression of someone wearily accustomed to the tiresomeness of dealing with intellectual inferiors.
The lawyers are the British establishment at their most unbearable, even though this time they are on the right side. Even Lipstadt comes over as abrasive and strident.
The narrative poses a fascinating quandary: should she fulfill her role as the hero of the narrative? She wants to do the right and heroic thing: to get on the stand, defend the truth and give survivors the right to have their say too.
Her lawyers strongly advise against it fearing Irving will most likely destroy her and any survivor who testifies. She believes she's the lead character here, but everybody is demanding she behave like an extra.