Council’s promises to children in care hampered by social worker “resistance”
- Credit: Copyright: Archant 2012
An effort to give every child in Norfolk County Council's care a promise setting out their legal rights has been hampered by resistance from some of the authority's social workers.
Councillors at yesterday's Children's Services Committee said they were 'disturbed' and 'shocked' by the opposition from some staff members, which has delayed its dissemination.
The promise was launched six months ago, and the committee heard it is now being distributed to children, through normal visits by their social workers.
As well as setting out their statutory rights, the two-page document - one for children aged up to 15, and another for young people aged 16 or above - outlines what looked after children can expect from the council, and tells them what they should do if the council is not keeping its promises.
Commitments made to children include:
You may also want to watch:
• 'If we decide to change where you live we will always ask your opinion'
• 'We will make sure where you live is safe and what you want, that you have contact with your family and that this is written into your care plan'
- 1 County welcomes tankers but motorists continue to queue for fuel
- 2 Norfolk wakes up to empty pumps – despite assurances of ‘ample fuel stocks’
- 3 Revealed: Where most parking tickets have been issued in Norfolk
- 4 Key workers share 'unnecessary and frustrating' impact of panic-buying
- 5 Weird Norfolk: Is Diss Mere the waterlogged crater of an extinct volcano?
- 6 Q&A: All you need to know about fuel shortages
- 7 Huge seaside home with indoor pool for sale for £600,000
- 8 Search continues for man with knife who chased victim into KFC
- 9 Controversy reignited over 300 home scheme on edge of Norwich
- 10 Queuing for petrol - a tale as old as time
• 'We will celebrate what you do well and not just concentrate on things that need to be improved'
Councillor Tom Garrod said: 'I cannot say how disappointed I am by the resistance.'
The report said: 'The key issue has been that some practitioners disagreed with the content, they thought it was too aspirational and that it 'set them up to fail'.'
Councillors heard some of the concerns were about the ability of the council to live up to its promises, given its current structures.
The council's services for looked after children have been under close scrutiny since an Ofsted inspection in July 2013 gave it the worst rating, 'inadequate', across the board.
Sheila Lock, interim director of children's services, said her message was that promise 'is not icing on the cake. This is the cake, folks. That is what we are saying to people very directly.'
She said she would keep 'batting away at it', and added: 'The vast majority of our staff really embrace this. They really want to embed this in their day-to-day practice.'
At the start of this month, 1060 children in Norfolk were in care, with the council as their corporate parent.
James Joyce, chairman of the committee, said: 'I feel that we as a committee should write to all our staff to say how important this is. I think we should write to our staff and put it in writing that this is what we are about, so there is no doubt.
'This is what we expect as corporate parents. This is the minimum.'
The committee unanimously agreed to write to all of the council's social care staff, stressing the priority it placed on the promise to looked after children.
What do you think? Write (giving your full contact details) to: The Letters Editor, EDP, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich NR1 1RE or email EDPLetters@archant.co.uk