Broads Authority accused of gagging its members

David Broad, former chairman of the Broads Authority Navigation Committee pictured at his home in Ho

David Broad, former chairman of the Broads Authority Navigation Committee pictured at his home in Horning.Picture: ANTONY KELLY - Credit: Archant

The organisation which looks after the Broads has been accused of gagging its members by an outgoing senior official.

David Broad, 68, has highlighted 'draconian' rules at the Broads Authority which he says he has been forced to follow in his seven-year tenure.

Mr Broad, the former navigation chairman and full authority vice chairman, has made the comments at the end of his membership at the organisation.

He has called for the policy – which says members' comments should be discussed with the head of communications or other senior figures before talking to the media – to be scrapped and has branded the authority 'an unaccountable quango'.

But Stephen Johnson, who has just stepped down after seven years as chairman, denied the authority gags its members and said the policy is standard practice in non-political organisations.Mr Broad, of Ropes Hill Dyke in Horning, believes the rules mean many members are unable to fulfil their job description of being ambassadors.

You may also want to watch:

He said: 'The new rules for member behaviour and conduct have been draconian and taken literally would prevent much of our job functions being achieved.

'The end of my membership at last allows me to say what I think should be said.

Most Read

'The communications policy is a gagging order. There's member and officer policy which defines what we can and can't do.

'It boils down to a situation where we have to get approval for what we want to say, and even then fault is found.'According to Mr Broad, members are unwilling to speak publicly on issues which have not been pre-approved for fear of being called in front of the monitoring officer.

He said: 'Members feel intimidated and unable to speak about anything.

'The rules need to be liberalised. It's a very restrictive policy and I think it's counter-productive.

'It's borne out of an unnecessary concern of what people might say critically.

'But members are supposed to be advocating the authority and the policy stops them from actually doing that.'

He believes other national parks have guidelines which allows its members to talk freely and leave comments on web forums without fear of being reprimanded.

Mr Broad also questioned the accountability of the authority and said that those who live and work on the Broads should be allowed to elect people to represent them.

The current rules see members selected by local councils, the secretary of state for the environment and two members from the navigation committee.

The Government announced last year that it would bring forward a bill which would have seen people living locally allowed to directly elect some of the Broads Authority members. But that promise is unlikely to materialise with the general election in May.

Mr Broad said: 'The Broads Authority is an unaccountable quango, in that it doesn't have any direct accountability in terms of elected members.

'It's a very powerful organisation and it's not accountable to anyone and that's very dangerous.'

The Broads Authority said it has measures in place to provide local accountability and said it supported the principle of direct elections when it was consulted by the Government.

Do you have a story about the Broads area? Contact Broads reporter Rosa McMahon on 01603 772453.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter