Thorpe Island row costs Broads Authority £90,000
- Credit: Archant Norfolk
The bitter planning row over Thorpe Island has cost the authority responsible for maintaining the Broads £90,000.
The EDP can today reveal the cost to the Broads Authority in defending their enforcement action against challenges from Roger Wood over the Thorpe St Andrew site since 2011.
The land, near Norwich, has been at the centre of a long-running legal wrangle between Mr Wood and the Broads Authority over its historic planning rights.
The case has been before two planning inspectors already, with a High Court judge deeming the development unlawful and the Court of the Appeal earlier this month refusing permission to appeal that decision.
Yet the row, which dates back to when the site was bought in 2007, may not be over immediately.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Wood – who maintains he does not need planning permission for the moored boats, jetties, pontoons and a container in because of previous owners' rights there – says he will fight the case to the very end.
He can still apply to the Court of Appeal for an oral hearing where he would present his case in person, something he insists he wants to do.
- 1 Fire crews battling large house blaze
- 2 Seven cosy pubs to visit in Norfolk this winter
- 3 Ford and Jaguar crash in second incident near village in same night
- 4 Jailed this week: Primark brawl, attempted murder and abuse
- 5 BBC Autumnwatch returns to Norfolk for another season
- 6 Road closed after crash involving car and two tractors
- 7 Revealed: The most expensive towns to buy a home in Norfolk
- 8 950-home bid takes step forward after £7m developer contribution agreed
- 9 'I remember shutting down' - Singer on cancer diagnosis at Norfolk hospital
- 10 What might happen to former Debenhams store in city centre?
For now, however, the Broads Authority is relieved the legal system has sided with them and say they want to ease the 'stress' suffered by nearby residents.
The legal cost to defend proceedings brought by Mr Wood, which were until February outsourced, have been described as 'far from ideal' by Andrea Long, director of planning and resources.
She said: 'It was our duty to the public to defend our lawful position against repeated challenges through the courts all at the instigation of the landowner.'
What do you think? Write, giving full contact details, to EDP Letters Editor, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich NR1 1RE or email email@example.com.