Bid to transform Ferry Boat Inn in Norwich fails
- Credit: © ARCHANT NORFOLK PHOTOGRAPHI
A bid to breath life into the derelict Ferry Boat Inn in Norwich has dramatically failed.
The Grade II-listed pub on the banks of the Wensum was once the city's hotspot for rock music until it closed in 2006 and has now stood vacant for nearly 10 years.
Yesterday plans to transform the building into 43 apartments were rejected by Norwich City Council.
Developers paid more than £500,000 for the site and proposed five buildings with basement car parks, including a seven-storey tower and riverside landscaping.
However in a heated debate councillors argued that the effect on conservation, potential flood risks, lack of affordable housing and out of character design had no place in the developing area on King Street.
You may also want to watch:
Simeon Jackson, green councillor for Mancroft, said: 'Even if it was 100pc affordable housing I wouldn't want to approve it as it's damaging to the heritage area. When you look at other landmarks you can quite easily define them; the only way you could describe this one is the carbuncle on the corner.
'It's not sensitive to the conservation area and developers need to go away and do a complete redesign.'
- 1 Son's plea for help as mum, 87, goes missing from care home
- 2 Man in critical condition after Norwich assault
- 3 Covid Delta variant cases double in Norfolk
- 4 This charming village pub is worth travelling to from across Norfolk
- 5 Weather warning for thunderstorms this week after Monday heat
- 6 11 Norfolk cafés perfect for outdoor dining
- 7 Broads pub with 'bags of potential' for sale for £375,000
- 8 Neighbours tell of shock as murder probe launched
- 9 Woman airlifted to hospital following equestrian accident in Beccles
- 10 Seller took motorbike for one last ride – and did 119mph on NDR
The seven-storey tower also received criticism from both Historic England and the Norwich Society who said the planned building was too high and would cause harm to the conservation area.
Four councillors voted against the developers' proposal, three voted in support and four abstained, leaving the developers to return to the drawing board.