See which lobby your MP went through in the vote on Syria air strikes.

Chloe Smith (Norwich North) FOR – 'There are risks every way, but I think the breadth of action outlined in the motion is our best hope of keeping British citizens safe from the evil intentions of IS while helping Syria reach a more peaceful and stable future.'

Clive Lewis (Norwich South) AGAINST – 'Today an increasing number of MPs show the world that the 15-year-old war on terror has to change tack. While tackling terrorism may have a military component, we must also under-stand you cannot bomb an idea.'

Keith Simpson (Broadland) FOR – 'I fully understand all the caveats of one kind or another that colleagues have put forward, but the most important immediate issue is making the strikes against Daesh in Syria that our intelligence and security agencies have identified and wish to carry out, because it offers a present threat to us, our constituents and our allies in Europe.'

Richard Bacon (South Norfolk) FOR – 'I am supporting the government because Daesh represents a clear and present danger to the British people, which is has already shown by beheading British citizens, machine-gunning British citizens on beaches, and massacring our friends and neighbours in France, who have asked for our help. Daesh would do more if it could and it has to be destroyed.'

Norman Lamb (North Norfolk) AGAINST – 'This dreadful threat has to be confronted and defeated but I am far from convinced that the proposed action will achieve that objective.'

Henry Bellingham (North-West Norfolk) FOR – 'Paris, the threat to our own citizens, the Vienna process and the UN resolution are all game changers.'

George Freeman (Mid-Norfolk) FOR – 'To truly destroy Isil, I believe we need a full spectrum response of military power. With a global alliance now attacking Isil, including RAF planes in Iraq by invitation of their government, it makes no sense to effectively grant Isil a 'safe haven' in eastern Syria. I therefore support air strikes on terrorist camps in Syria.'

Brandon Lewis (Great Yarmouth) FOR – 'It is important that we do the right thing to protect our national security and that we support our international partners in the work to degrade and defeat the terrorists.'

Peter Aldous (Waveney) FOR – 'Isis poses a very direct threat to the UK, and British air strikes in Syria can play a vital role in reducing this.'

Elizabeth Truss (South-West Norfolk) FOR – 'I support the motion.'

Therese Coffey (Suffolk Coastal) FOR – 'To support our allies in the deployment of strategic plan to remove Daesh through diplomatic, humanitarian and military action'

Stephen Barclay (North-East Cambridgeshire) FOR

Matthew Hancock (West Suffolk) FOR – 'The choice is no whether we tackle Daesh but whether we tackle them now, in Syria, or wait and hope we can continue to foil their attempts to attack us here.'

Dan Poulter (Central Suffolk and Ipswich) FOR – 'The question of whether Isis presents a threat to our national security is clearly yes, and if we have a threat it is in the interests of my constituent to deal with that threat.'