Search

‘I would fight on’: Anger as council ends turbines legal battle

PUBLISHED: 15:07 17 March 2020 | UPDATED: 15:07 17 March 2020

NNDC leader Sarah Bütikofer said they had ended their legal battle over two wind turbines off the coast. Picture: STUART ANDERSON

NNDC leader Sarah Bütikofer said they had ended their legal battle over two wind turbines off the coast. Picture: STUART ANDERSON

Archant

A council has ended its legal battle against plans to build two controversial wind turbines near the north Norfolk coast.

File photo of a wind turbine and inset, David Mack, who is behind one of the applications. Pictures: Archant/Supplied by David MackFile photo of a wind turbine and inset, David Mack, who is behind one of the applications. Pictures: Archant/Supplied by David Mack

The proposals for the turbines between Sheringham and Holt were given the go-ahead last month by the Planning Inspectorate after years of battles between developers, residents and North Norfolk District Council (NNDC), which tried to have them stopped.

But the council said it would no longer continue its legal battle against the plans, which will see a 66m turbine built at Pond Farm, Bodham and a 78m turbine at Selbrigg Farm in Hempstead.

The planned sites are around 3km away from each other, and although separate companies are behind each, Paul Griffiths, from the inspectorate, considered them both together.

A NNDC spokesman said: “Despite strong objections from the council and local residents, who argued against the turbines on grounds of the harm to landscape, heritage assets and wildlife would not be outweighed by the comparatively limited renewable energy benefits, the Planning Inspectorate has upheld its original decision to allow both turbines.”

David Mack. Picture: SUPPLIED BY Mr MackDavid Mack. Picture: SUPPLIED BY Mr Mack

You may also want to watch:

MORE: Two wind turbines get go-ahead near North Norfolk coast

Leader of the council Sarah Bütikofer said: “We are extremely disappointed by the decision of the Planning Inspectorate in the long battle to oppose these applications.

“We have taken legal advice from counsel who have advised us during this eight-year fight that a further challenge would have no prospect of success.”

The council’s decision was criticised by North Norfolk MP Duncan Baker, who said: “I do not agree with ending the legal process - I would fight on.”

In reaching his decision, Mr Griffiths concluded that “while the proposals would cause some harm in terms of landscape character and visual amenity, the overall impact of the wind turbines would be limited”.

He went on to state he disagreed that many heritage assets would be affected and, in his view, only Baconsthorpe Castle complex would be affected by both turbines and Barningham Hall only affected by the Bodham turbine.

However, while harm was identified to these highly-graded heritage assets, the inspector concluded the public benefits of renewable energy generation would more than outweigh the harm identified.


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Eastern Daily Press. Click the link in the orange box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Eastern Daily Press