Shake-up will see 73 of 84 Norfolk wards changed

Parliament now needs to agree the changes. The new arrangements will then apply for the 2025 council elections.

Electoral map shake-up will see radical changes in Norfolk. Photo: Denise Bradley - Credit: copyright: Archant 2014

Thousands of people across Norfolk will find themselves in different wards, under a shake-up of electoral divisions announced today.

Norfolk will continue to be represented by 84 councillors, the same number as now, but 73 of the wards will see radical changes to their boundaries.

The independent Local Government Boundary Commission for England announced the review in 2019,  because of what it described as "electoral imbalance in Norfolk divisions".

How the new electoral map of Norfolk will look.

How the new electoral map of Norfolk will look. - Credit: LGBCE and Ordnance Survey

The review aims to make sure each councillor represents roughly the same number of voters - an average of 8,858 - and that each division reflects the interests and identities of communities.

Currently, 26 division are more than 10pc away from the average, which is expected to rise to 37 by 2025.


You may also want to watch:


The commission's final recommendations will see many divisions look radically different, as well as the creation of a Hethersett ward in South Norfolk. 

In total, 174 people and organisations made comments on the draft plans.

Most Read

Changes made to earlier proposals in response to what local responses include:  

  • Redrawing the boundaries around Thetford Town to better represent the community interests of the area 

  • Changes in the Taverham area to better reflect the community identities of electors in the parishes of Attlebridge, Morton on the Hill, and Weston Longville. 

Publishing the recommendations Professor Colin Mellors, chair of the commission, said: “We are very grateful to people in Norfolk.

"We looked at all the views they gave us.

"They helped us improve our earlier proposals.  

 “We believe the new arrangements will guarantee electoral fairness while maintaining local ties.”   

Of the comments made on the plans, 56 came from residents, with many people raising concerns about what it would mean for communities, with some calling it a waste of money while others argued it was just to benefit the "government in charge".

The only local business to respond was the owner of the Costessey Park Golf Course, who raised concerns that the boundary changes would mean the park would be split between two councils, potentially creating conflict for any future developments.

Parliament now needs to agree the changes. The new arrangements will then apply for the 2025 council elections.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter
Comments powered by Disqus