Council spent £20m on an office and industrial units before coronavirus hit
- Credit: Google Maps/Ian Burt
City Hall chiefs splashed out more than £20m on an office block and industrial units before the pandemic hit commercial property prices.
Coronavirus has seen the value of commercial property and rents plummet and Norwich City Council has offered tenants a three-month rent deferral.
It said the decision to invest another £21m in commercial property was made before coronavirus reached the UK.
In February it spent £14.5m on three industrial units at an estate called Stafford Park in Telford. The units are let and should bring in the council around £1m a year in rent.
Then in March it spent another £6.9m on Lawrence House on St Andrews Hill in the city centre. Much of it is rented, but according to its website, thousands of feet of office space are available.
It has spent £70m since 2017 on commercial property, including £6.2m on a Travelodge. The hotel chain has asked for rent cuts to avoid administration during the pandemic.
The council said its “prudent” investments helped fill the gap left by government cuts.
The rental income funds one in every £7 it spends on public services and it gets a return of almost 3pc a year.
You may also want to watch:
But its plans to spend another £25m this year on commercial property have been thrown into doubt by the Treasury.
It hoped to borrow cheap money from the Treasury to snap up its next purchases.
But the Treasury wants to ban councils borrowing money, which is meant to be invested in local infrastructure projects, for commercial property.
It said it wants to see an end to “speculative commercial investments”, warning it puts taxpayers at risk.
- 1 Family of missing man informed after body found in water
- 2 Buy a former 1950s police station for sale for £330,000
- 3 'Stay local' warning and visitors fined after hundreds head to Sea Palling
- 4 Police give out £200 penalty notices to day-trippers for second weekend running
- 5 When can I go to the beach? Lockdown travel questions answered
- 6 Tributes to kind-hearted dad-of-three who died from Covid
- 7 Cardiac arrest call sparks rescue operation near beauty spot
- 8 Photos show RAF centre being visited by ‘beast’ of an aircraft
- 9 'They think they can get away with it' - crowds flock to seaside village
- 10 Households with children to get two Covid tests per person every week
A council spokesman said it would review its policy.
Leader Alan Waters said: “The government can change their minds and stop councils investing in commercial property but they will need to deliver an effective plan B.”
Mr Waters said the council was following encouragement from the government to be more commercial and plug the “brutal” 60pc cuts to council funding since 2010.
Councillor Ben Price, from the opposition Green Party, accused the council of not having its finger on the pulse.
“I have warned the council repeatedly that it should have radically changed its commercial investment programme,” he said.
“The council should invest in renewable energy or technologies, which will deliver the sought-after income, whilst making a positive impact on the city and the future of this planet.”
Green Party leader Martin Schmierer added: “In the last recession, the value of property and income from rents both fell, so it was clear that these were high-risk investments, even before the current pandemic.
“Yet the Labour-run council insisted on borrowing mind-boggling sums and rushing through investments which may now come back to hit them.”
•The £6.6 billion spending spree
MPs warned as early as 2016 about the risks of councils putting huge amounts of public cash into commercial property, particularly with high streets struggling.
“If commercial decisions go wrong, council taxpayers will end up footing the bill and other services will be under threat,” they said.
But that warning fell on deaf ears at many councils.
They spent £6.6 billion from 2016 to 2019, the National Audit Office (NAO) found, on investments including shopping malls and retail parks.
In February the NAO again warned of the risks to public services if a recession led to fall in the value of investments.
“The benefits... must be considered against the potential risks to authorities,” they said.
That helped spark the Treasury’s consultation on council’s borrowing public money for these purchases.
They said these investments “diverts money from core services” and risks distorting property markets.
•Follow the latest from our investigations unit on Facebook