North Norfolk District Council to challenge Bodham wind turbine go-ahead in high court
- Credit: citizenside.com
North Norfolk District Council (NNDC) is to mount a high court challenge against a decision to give the planning go-ahead for a wind turbine in Bodham.
The council's cabinet agreed to the move, which could cost £20,000, this morning believing the planning inspector's decision flies in the face of the will of the local community.
They also fear it could have wider implications for north Norfolk's economy by opening the gates to more onshore wind turbine applications, damaging the district's vital tourism industry.
The council believes the 86.5m turbine, at Pond Farm, would be seen from over five kilometres away creating an intrusion in an unspoilt landscape near the north Norfolk coast.
Last month a planning inspector overturned on appeal a decision by NNDC's development committee unanimously refusing the turbine application by David Mack, part of the family-run firm Genetec.
You may also want to watch:
Now NNDC's legal department has taken advice from a barrister on whether there were grounds for challenging the inspector's decision and has been told there are two.
The subject was raised as a matter of urgent business this morning because the deadline for any challenge is May 20.
- 1 Norfolk wakes up to empty pumps – despite assurances of ‘ample fuel stocks’
- 2 Huge seaside home with indoor pool for sale for £600,000
- 3 Man dies in hospital after fight near Norfolk pub
- 4 The Bill star reveals he has moved to Norfolk and why he loves it
- 5 Why has a golden dome appeared in this Norfolk town?
- 6 Delays on roads as petrol queues continue
- 7 Dramatic pictures as huge barn fire breaks out near coast
- 8 Queues form at Norfolk petrol stations - despite reassurances over stock
- 9 Q&A: All you need to know about fuel shortages
- 10 A11 to undergo 18 months of roadworks
Roger Howe, NNDC's planning legal manager, said the application had generated 1,800 letters, emails and other representations from people, 1,450 of which had been against the turbine plan.
But he said the level of opposition was not an acceptable reason for mounting a challenge.
'We have to show that the inspector erred on a point of law - that he made a legal mistake,' said Mr Howe.
The barrister had advised that the inspector failed to give priority to the statutory development plan under terms of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act of 2004.
And that he failed to have special regard to the desirability of preserving listed buildings under provisions of the Planning (and Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
NNDC's cabinet member for planning, Benjie Cabbell Manners said: 'There has been a lot of dismay and amazement that the inspector allowed this appeal. The council is under a legal obligation to protect and enhance Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty throughout north Norfolk.
'I strongly feel that our locally-based development committee is best placed to take into account the facts relating to this area when considering planning decisions of this nature as they have wide implications for the residents of our often quite isolated local rural communities.
'We regard tourism as a vital component of the economy of north Norfolk and do not wish to see any development which would adversely detract from this offering.'
Leading anti-turbine campaigner David Ramsbotham, who was elected as a UKIP member of Norfolk County Council earlier this month, welcomed NNDC's decision.
'This is a great day for democracy in Norfolk with North Norfolk District Council's decision to continue to fight the Bodham wind turbine and Norfolk County Council's agreement that the future of the King's Lynn incinerator should be discussed by the full council.'
Mr Mack said he was disappointed the council felt it could waste taxpayers' money fighting something promoted by the government.
He added: 'We will be fighting our corner as well. A lot of people in the area are for the project but the council isn't hearing their voices above the very loud shouting of a minority.'