“Hypocrisy” or “privatisation to a ludicrous extreme” - Norwich politicians in war over words over NHS
- Credit: Geoff Wilson
A war of words over the NHS has broken out between two politicians fighting to represent Norwich North next year.
As Labour proposals to 'take a scalpel to cut the heart out' of the Government's 'hated' NHS reforms cleared their first Commons hurdle, sitting MP Chloe Smith has accused her opponent Jessica Asato of 'hypocrisy', and has replied to constituents asking her to support the Labour bill, with an attack on the candidate.
Ms Smith has quoted a letter from Ms Asato to shadow health secretary Andy Burnham in 2009 raising concerns about his plans to make the NHS a 'preferred provider' of NHS services.
Ms Asato, who was the acting director of Blairite think tank Progress at the time, told Mr Burnham in 2009: 'By restricting the use of the private and voluntary sectors solely to the provision of new services will limit your ability to use their huge innovatory potential in a constrained fiscal environment. Both sectors are ideally placed to help find more cost-effective and user-orientated solutions to provision as budget holders increasingly strive for efficiency savings.'
This week Ms Asato called on Ms Smith to back Clive Efford's National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers Bill) - a move Ms Smith claimed was 'saying the opposite', to her previous views.
You may also want to watch:
But Ms Asato said she believed there was a place for a degree of private and voluntary sector involvement in NHS provision, but the Tories had taken it to a 'ludicrous extreme' and put competition at the very heart of all NHS provision.
She said: 'This has led to fragmentation and a dangerous distortion of priorities as well as escalating costs. NHS managers are now spending £65m a year bidding against each other for the same contracts, still more millions on competition lawyers and even have to spend money to bid for services they already run,' she said.
- 1 County welcomes tankers but motorists continue to queue for fuel
- 2 Latest situation on fuel sees more queues despite continued assurances
- 3 Jailed in Norfolk: Paedophiles and man caught with £15k of cannabis
- 4 Controversy reignited over 300 home scheme on edge of Norwich
- 5 Revealed: Where most parking tickets have been issued in Norfolk
- 6 Key workers share 'unnecessary and frustrating' impact of panic-buying
- 7 Huge seaside home with indoor pool for sale for £600,000
- 8 'It's looking bleak' - City taxi firms respond to panic-buying at the pumps
- 9 Roadworks to be aware of in Norfolk this week
- 10 Man dies in hospital after fight near Norfolk pub
The Commons vote was passed by 241 votes to 18, with a majority of 223, at second reading, with very few coalition MPs turning up to the House of Commons session.
It is unlikely the reforms will become law in their current form as a Private Member's Bill without the coalition's backing, as it only has limited time to progress through the Commons and will be opposed by the Government at future stages.
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the proposals would form the basis of Labour's Repeal Bill if it forms the next government.
Introducing his Bill, Mr Efford said it will remove the obligation to put NHS services out to tender and create a system for contracting that puts patients ahead of competition. An additional section will prevent competition and procurement regulations arising from the massive EU-US free trade deal known as TTIP applying to the NHS, with critics warning the trade deal could lead to US companies suing future governments for reversing privatisation.
He said: 'This Bill is not the solution to all of the mistakes that this Government has made in its top-down restructuring of the NHS but it is an important block to enforced privatisation.
'The argument can be simplified into two distinct sides. If you believe that the National Health Service should be a pure market, open to competition regulations, where the interests of competition are put before National Health Service patients, then you belong on the side of the Government.
'If you believe that the NHS is a public service that should be free of competition rules and put the interests of NHS patients first, then you should vote for this Bill today.
'We know that No 10 did not understand what was going on in 2012, the Chancellor was asleep at the wheel, the Liberal Democrats suffering from some form of terminal Stockholm Syndrome were led by the nose to turn the NHS from a public service into a free market. The Bill takes a scalpel to cut the heart out of the hated 2012 Act and put right the worst of their mistakes. It will remove the sections that require tendering of NHS services for competition with the private sector, the result of which has been millions of pounds being diverted from patient care into pockets of lawyers and accountants through the tendering process.'
Health Minister Dan Poulter, who is a practising NHS doctor as well as an MP, defended the Government's reforms and insisted they must be allowed to bed in.
Dr Poulter also dismissed concerns over the TTIP EU-US trade deal, saying it would have no effect on the NHS.
The Tory minister said: 'I reaffirm this Government's commitment to the founding principles of the NHS - a health service free at the point of delivery and recognising that, since its very creation in 1948 by Nye Bevan, our NHS has always been a public-private partnership.
'The aim should be to change fundamentally the way the NHS was run, to break up the monolith, to introduce a new relationship with the private sector, to import concepts for choice and competition - those are not my words, but those of Labour prime minister Tony Blair in the reforms he introduced.
'It is important the NHS is not used as a political football and services are always designed and delivered in the right way for patients. There is often too much scaremongering in these debates.'