MP’s fears over ‘radioactive risk’ on land wind farm firm wants to dig up
- Credit: Archant Library
An MP has raised fears about an energy firm digging up land which was contaminated after a fighter jet crash.
As reported in August, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) previously warned of a 'radioactive substance risk' on the farmland near Necton following the 1996 accident.
The Danish F-16 crashed into the sugar beet field shortly after taking off from RAF Marham. Two pilots ejected and survived.
That land is now due to be dug up to connect an offshore windfarm to the National Grid at Necton.
But fresh evidence from campaigners, the Necton Substations Action Group, shows a much larger site, which energy firm Vattenfall wants to excavate to build two new substations, could have been contaminated in the crash.
You may also want to watch:
Campaigners have written a report based on MoD documents in which they claim: 'The worst case scenario must be adopted – which is that contaminants may remain in the soil at a deep level, and any disturbance could create an environmental disaster.'
Mid Norfolk MP George Freeman has now written to Breckland Council with his concerns after viewing the dossier.
- 1 Owner of new pet shop says he will put animal welfare before sales
- 2 Long tailbacks on A47 due to roadworks and lane closure
- 3 Three adorable abandoned day-old kittens adopted by stray
- 4 Driver stopped by police - 20 minutes after being given court ban
- 5 'Complete shock' - Neighbours stunned after cannabis farm uncovered
- 6 Widow fighting for wedding refund
- 7 Police break up house party with 28 people crammed into flat
- 8 New owners of popular park café set out vision for 'beautiful' venue
- 9 Antiques Road Trip films at Norfolk collectables shop
- 10 Two men charged with murder of 23-year-old
'It now appears that the entire site in question could potentially be contaminated, increasing the already very serious risks posed by construction in the area,' Mr Freeman said. 'Residents must not be put at risk.'
The decision on whether the project gets the go-ahead will be taken by the Planning Inspectorate and Mr Freeman urged them to consider the evidence.
Vattenfall did not know about the crash until being told about by campaigners.
It means it is not referred to in the environmental assessment it has produced for the Planning Inspectorate.
But Ruari Lean, from Vattenfall, said the assessment was 'robust'.
He said: 'We did receive anecdotal reports of the crash shortly before submission of our application, but publicly available information did not verify details of the crash or its location.
'Our application does... set out the approach to assessing potential contaminated sites which would be undertaken post-consent, and which will be approved by the Local Authority in consultation with the Environment Agency.'