High Court dismisses Broads National Park rebrand challenge
A High Court inquiry into the Broads National Park rebranding has ruled in favour of the authority behind the decision.
Mr Justice Holgate yesterday gave the go-ahead for the Broads Authority to continue using the Broads National Park branding, after it was challenged by landowners Tim and Geli Harris.
The authority, which voted in January last year to rebrand the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, said while there would be no legal change in status, the image would boost tourism. The Broads has been part of the National Park family since 1989, but has never held the legal status.
In August last year, Mr and Mrs Harris were granted a judicial review inquiry, claiming the authority acted 'unlawfully' and that the decision was misleading.
Yesterday, Jacquie Burgess, chairman of the authority, said she was 'thrilled' with the decision.
You may also want to watch:
She said: 'The Broads fully deserves to be known as a national park – as much as the Lake District, the Cairngorms or any of the US Parks such as the Everglades or Yosemite.
'The National Park brand is
- 1 Son's plea for help as mum, 87, goes missing from care home
- 2 Covid Delta variant cases double in Norfolk
- 3 'I can't carry it' - Shock as plant starts growing eight inches a day
- 4 Hundreds of volunteers search for missing 87-year-old Margaret Smith
- 5 Family's distress as Covid rules force double-jabbed mother into isolation
- 6 WATCH: 'Selfish' drug-driver ploughs into police detective's vehicle
- 7 Woman airlifted to hospital following equestrian accident in Beccles
- 8 This charming village pub is worth travelling to from across Norfolk
- 9 Man defrauded more than £1.3m from Norfolk firm to fund gambling addiction
- 10 Glamping site approval despite highway safety concerns
internationally recognised and hugely appealing to visitors. It is shorthand for a place that is special, is properly looked after and deserves to be valued by everyone who visits and lives there.'
Mr and Mrs Harris, who say they are considering an appeal, said: 'The Broads Authority does not deserve to call itself a National Park for
branding purposes because in our experience it does not give priority to its core conservation objective of protecting the unique habitats of the Broads for future generations but prefers to focus on eye-catching PR initiatives.'
The judge ordered the couple to pay £10,000 towards the authority's legal costs of defending the action.
According to the full judgment, the authority's legal costs 'greatly exceed the figure of £10,000'.
The decision has been welcomed by National Parks UK and Visit East Anglia.
What do you think of the decision? Email firstname.lastname@example.org