Ashtons Legal: When does a tweet become a twibel?
- Credit: Archant
'Twibel' case underlines the need for every business to get to grips with social media, writes Michael Frape of Ashtons Legal.
Every business using social media should get to grips with publishing law and advertising regulations if they are to avoid reputation-damaging incidents.
The reminder follows the news that columnist Katie Hopkins was recently refused leave to appeal against a recent High Court libel verdict, where she was found to have published defamatory tweets – or what's been coined a 'twibel'.
Anyone using social media is a publisher, putting information out into the public domain.
But unlike newspapers and book publishers, most businesses don't have a good understanding of publishing law and how to avoid breaching it.
Similarly, many businesses are not considering how their social media posts may breach advertising regulations, as the boundaries between paid-for advertising and other forms of communication become more blurred.
For Katie Hopkins, the tweets she posted that were found to be defamatory implied that prominent poverty campaigner and writer Jack Monroe had defaced a war memorial, in a case of mistaken identity.
- 1 Café serving produce fresh from its farm opens in north Norfolk
- 2 Norfolk fish and chip shop named one of the 10 best in the UK
- 3 Vandals smash charity dinosaur trail T.rex and leave kebab in its mouth
- 4 Banksy mural created to spark debate after town's artwork was sold
- 5 Woman accused of exposing herself to boy outside Lowestoft park
- 6 Motorcyclist suffers serious injuries in crash with 4x4 outside village pub
- 7 Some firefighters using foodbanks amid £18m payroll system 'farce'
- 8 Flames grip barn in north Norfolk
- 9 Council refusing special school place for disabled girl
- 10 Teenager died after choking on own vomit
Ms Monroe offered her the chance to apologise publicly or face legal action, but Hopkins refused.
When the case reached the High Court, the tweets were found to have caused 'serious' harm to Ms Monroe's reputation and Hopkins was ordered to pay damages of £24,000.
In addition to that and of far greater concern to Hopkins will have been being ordered to pay Ms Monroe's legal costs, which are thought to be a six-figure sum.
In deciding the case, the court had to determine whether the tweets met the requirement for harm that is set out in the Defamation Act 2013. Experts say the ruling is the most important case to date involving libel on social media.
Controlling social media content is a huge issue for business.
Staff could learn from the 26-point guide on how to use Twitter, published by the High Court as an appendix to its official ruling in the Hopkins case, which provides a summary of how the platform works.
It makes for useful reading, even for those who think themselves experts, as a reminder of who will receive postings when tweeting, re-tweeting or replying.