Search

Is our farming industry about to be ‘thrown under the bus’ in trade discussions?

PUBLISHED: 06:18 10 June 2020 | UPDATED: 06:30 10 June 2020

Bruce Masson, a partner at Norfolk accountancy firm MHA Larking Gowen, says the farming sector faces a major upheaval as the Agriculture Bill progresses through Parliament while trade negotiations set standards for imported foods. Picture: Sylvaine Poitau

Bruce Masson, a partner at Norfolk accountancy firm MHA Larking Gowen, says the farming sector faces a major upheaval as the Agriculture Bill progresses through Parliament while trade negotiations set standards for imported foods. Picture: Sylvaine Poitau

Sylvaine Poitau

The government’s post-Brexit Agriculture Bill is being debated in the House of Lords today while global trade negotiations continue which will set the standards for imported foods. BRUCE MASSON, a partner and agricultural specialist in the Diss office of accountancy firm MHA Larking Gowen, looks at how these crucial discussions will affect the future prospects of East Anglia’s farmers.

With the Agriculture Bill having its second reading and debate in the House of Lords on June 10, and possible Royal Assent in due course, the agricultural industry will brace itself for its biggest upheaval since 1973.

The current pandemic has demonstrated the importance of having a strong and resilient supply chain, especially for domestic output.

On the face of it, the principal demands of the major industry voices for the Agriculture Bill are seemingly straightforward: strong provisions on food security, safeguarding of standards and resilience and support for the production of food. Nothing these days is straightforward.

The “Parish” amendment to the bill, which sought to enshrine in law the parity of standards of imported food with our own domestic output was voted down in parliament.

READ MORE: MPs ‘missed opportunity’ to secure vital safeguards for food standards, say farmers

Given that the current government had promised to maintain high standards on imported food and they have a large majority, this came as quite a surprise. The main reason for its rejection was that it would be potentially harmful to future trade deals the UK is hoping to achieve as we would be seen to be discriminating against other countries’ food standards, which is against World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules.

So, is UK agriculture going to be thrown under the bus for the greater good of the UK economy? Yes and no.

Just because the UK may end up importing cheaper alternatives, will people buy them? Of course they will. Is that any different to the current situation? Not really.

One thing the pandemic has showcased is the ability and capability of the UK food production network. If, as expected, the bill passes in its current format, the UK agricultural industry will be faced with a PR problem in how it continues to inform consumers about its produce.

This has always been a problem and it doesn’t matter how many Red Tractors or Union Flags are stuck on packaging, there will always be a percentage of consumers who will purchase purely on price and not provenance.

If people want to buy chlorinated chicken and they are fully aware that’s what they’re doing, then how can we stop them? We can’t, but chlorinated chicken doesn’t have to be on the menu, as the US has pointed out in its other worldwide trade deals that exclude it or have a dual-tariff system in place.

READ MORE: Don’t allow trade deals to undermine our food standards, plead Norfolk farmers

While a concerted PR effort to reinforce our food security and production standards will help, the average consumer will more than likely have less disposable income as a result of the pandemic. Even before the crisis, average UK household spend on food was 10.6pc compared to 25pc only a generation ago.

The percentage may not change as the household income will fall so there will be a net reduction. Only time will tell if there’s a wholesale shift into cheaper alternatives but consumers do tend to be creatures of habit.

Pressure on farm income will come from the phased reduction in the Basic Payment Scheme [which distributes the EU’s land-based subsidies] from next year. There are lobbying efforts to see this deferred until 2022 but the money tree in Westminster is looking more than parched so it’s unlikely this will happen, but the pressure must be applied.

It’s unlikely the sector voices will get exactly what they want from the Bill but hopefully it will only be a distraction allowing the UK to focus on what it can do best.

UK producers will have to think more about what they produce rather than how. The UK government is desperate to get itself the best trade deals around the world so the concessions, however they may impact so-called smaller industries, will be made.


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Eastern Daily Press. Click the link in the orange box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Eastern Daily Press