Councillors extend Lynn retirement flats proposals, amid row with developers

03 November, 2014 - 14:03
The old grain silo site, South Quay, King's Lynn. Picture taken from the bank at West Lynn.

The old grain silo site, South Quay, King's Lynn. Picture taken from the bank at West Lynn. PHOTO: IAN BURT

Archant © 2008

Plans to build dozens of retirement homes in King’s Lynn have stalled, amid a row over whether the developer should pay for affordable homes.

McCarthy and Stone Retirement Lifestyles Ltd were given the nod to build 37 apartments on the South Quay King’s Lynn silo site on July 29 - subject to securing a section 106 agreement in three months.

The developers have failed to agree a clause in the agreement in which they would put money towards the future provision of affordable homes.

King’s Lynn and West Norfolk borough councillors reviewed the proposals at a planning meeting yesterday.

Councillors unanimously agreed to give the developers an extra month for the section 106 agreement.

Should McCarthy and Stone fail to do so, the council would likely make an appeal.

Councillor Vivienne Spikings said: “It is very displeasing the bullying stance which the developer’s are taking.

“The need to give people affordable housing is essential and it is something we have to take a very strong stance on.”

Earlier this month the developer won a planning appeal to build a similar retirement complex in Hunstanton - in which it argued that the council’s call for a £360,000 contribution towards affordable housing provision was too much.

A government planning inspector decided that the company’s offer of £30,000 was enough.

The same difficulties are facing the silo site, with the developers stating there isn’t enough “financial headroom” to put money towards off-site affordable housing.

A report to the planning committee said: “The ramification of the Hunstanton appeal decision is that this stance by the council is considered to be neither necessary nor reasonable on development of this scale.”

Councillors expressed fears that the council would “get a hiding” if it goes to appeal.

Do you have any West Norfolk news stories? Email


  • Typical of developers, who welsh on every deal they make once they've got some kind of permission. In more sensible times it was called "gaining a pecuniary advantage by deception" and was a statutory offence; alas, now repealed, as it seems tailor-made for developers.

    Report this comment

    T Doff

    Monday, November 3, 2014

  • Why are they giving permission for flats there in the first place? The stink of fish meal and grain may have gone but the mud -does it not remain as malodorous at low tide as ever, does the fog not still hang over it in winter and the risk of over topping remain?.Presumably we are talking about retirement flats for the wealthy who might just not use them all the time but when they pop up for the Festival...I concede that shopping and entertainment facilities are in easy walking distance, but what is this obsession with building next to rivers ? The old places are merchants homes and stores which needed to be there-why not leave the Quay for leisure?

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Monday, November 3, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

property mortgage finder

Property E-edition


Enjoy the Property


Mustard TV

Meet the Property Editor

Caroline Culot

email | @CarolineJCulot

I am the property editor in charge of delivering some exciting and informative content within Archant’s varied titles. We have 16-17 pages of stories, features and columns in the EDP Property supplement out every Friday free in your EDP so please don’t miss it.

Ultimate Property E-edition


Enjoy the Ultimate
Property E-edition

Do you have a Question or Problem? Ask our expert for property advice

Crime figures for your area