January 29 2015 Latest news:
Monday, March 31, 2014
Campaigners were lost for words at the news - but angry the decision will have taken four years, if councillors back the recommendation to ditch the burner on Monday.
They were lost for words when the news they’d spent four years wishing for broke, the two Davids who’d battled to bring down Goliath.
“It’s been four years of nightmare,” said IT consultant Michael de Whalley, one of the founders of KLWIN (King’s Lynn Without Incineration).
“It’s always been an insane decision but for them to realise it after four years, it beggars belief. It’s taken so much effort for a community to have its voice heard - especially after that poll.”
Fellow campaigner Mike Knights has spent countless nights at his kitchen table writing e-mails and letters until the early hours.
“I’m delighted,” he said. “At last. Instead of being tied to the most expensive waste incinerator in Britain we can now save a fortune on waste treatment and protect our health and environment.”
Norfolk County Council kept it quiet to start with. All they said was a new recycling facility would be built at Saddlebow, on the outskirts of King’s Lynn near the speedway track, the tidal river and Relief Channel.
“It was meant to take us by surprise by calling it a fluffy name like a power and recycling centre,” said Mr Knights, a 48-year-old fruit farmer from Middleton.
“You can call it a fluffy name and by the time most people realise what they’re stuck with, it’s got planning permission and they’re half way through building it. I think we found out about it a year before we were meant to.”
Over in King’s Lynn, West Norfolk council started circling the wagons as an incinerator emerged as the preferred technology for the site, in March 2011.
It agreed to set aside a £200,000 war chest for legal advice and commissioned a poll of the borough’s 110,000 or so inhabitants. More than 65,000 people said they did not want the incinerator. But the county council voted to push ahead with awarding the contract to Cory Wheelabrator.
The opposition grew louder the more county councillors ignored it, with angry protests as they awarded planning permission. But even as the decision was announced, the government which extolled the virtues of localism struck what turned out to be the fatal blow when it called in the papers.
More than a year after a lengthy public inquiry, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has yet to announce his decision. In the end it was his delay which torpedoed the incinerator. It ran out of time.
West Norfolk council leader Nick Daubney said: “I am delighted. The incinerator was unneeded, unwanted and made no financial sense. We did a poll where 65,000 people said no to the incinerator yet they flew in the face of the public which was arrogant.
“I think the politicians who have been promoting the incinerator should consider their positions.
“I very much hope that this is the end of it all. It’s very good news, I think it gives us opportunity to come up with a joint and agreed solution for the waste in West Norfolk, and I am keen to be a part of that.”
County councillor Alexander Kemp, whose ward sits adjacent to the site, leads the two-strong independent group on the county council.
“We’re very pleased with what the officers have recommended,” she said. “We’re hoping people will pull together and vote for King’s Lynn.
“Available green alternatives could halve the cost and save hard working Norfolk taxpayers and people reliant on services £250m over 25 years.
“That’s before you consider that King’s Lynn deserves to have this threat hanging over it taken away once and for all. There was a campaign in Norwich against an incinerator at Costessey, they must have thought: ‘Ooh, King’s Lynn - we’ll put it there.”