Supreme Court ruling in Kevin Nunn case casts doubt over Norfolk man’s bid for freedom

PUBLISHED: 08:00 23 June 2014 | UPDATED: 11:40 23 June 2014

Antonio Lopes is serving life for murdering his partner.

Antonio Lopes is serving life for murdering his partner.

A convicted murderer’s bid to have evidence reexamined looks unlikely to go ahead after a test case in Suffolk was thrown out by the Supreme Court.

Antonio Lopes is serving life for murdering his partner, Dominguez Olivais, and dumping her body in the River Bure at Great Yarmouth in 2002. Lopes, who was convicted by a jury at Norwich Crown Court of strangling Miss Olivais and violating her body with a piece of wood, has protested his innocence from jail.

Last month, defence lawyer James Saunders said Lopes could challenge his conviction if the Supreme Court ruled in favour of allowing DNA samples in a Suffolk murder case to be reexamined.

However, Woolpit man Kevin Nunn - convicted of killing his ex-partner Dawn Walker in 2006 - last week lost that case. The Supreme Court justices unanimously rejected Nunn’s appeal, casting doubt of the likelihood of Lopes applying to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the body charged with examining potential wrongful convictions.

Nunn’s legal team, lead by Mr Saunders, was trying to force Suffolk police to give them access to key forensic evidence they claimed was not properly examined at the time. This includes sperm found on Miss Walker’s body after she died in February 2005, from which the original investigators were unable to get a full DNA profile.

If that test case had been successful, Mr Saunders planned to seek similar access to evidence used in Lopes’ trial which, he said, could now be better examined with today’s DNA technology.

Opponents have claimed a ruling in favour of retesting DNA samples could lead to a lack of finality with the justice system - as science improves, more and more closed cases and convictions based on circumstantial evidence could potentially be reopen.

Mr Saunders, however, believes the ruling would have lead to a “manageable” number of appeals - “hundreds” at most.

Related articles


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Eastern Daily Press visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Eastern Daily Press staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Eastern Daily Press account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now


Most Read

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Most Commented

Latest from the EDP



max temp: 10°C

min temp: 6°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition


Enjoy the EDP
digital edition