Report examines response to Lowestoft and Southwold tidal surge

Lowestoft Storm Floods.
London Road South. Lowestoft Storm Floods. London Road South.

Friday, September 5, 2014
6:30 AM

The devastating impact and consequences of the tidal surge that battered Lowestoft and Southwold in December have been laid bare in a council report that says lessons have been learned from the floods.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Lings Honda in Horn Hill Lowestoft during the tidal surge of December 5, 2013Lings Honda in Horn Hill Lowestoft during the tidal surge of December 5, 2013

Waveney District Council has published a report into December 5’s surge, which sets out the authority’s response to the event, which led to 167 premises being flooded and 77 people being put up in special evacuation centres. The report details how reviews have been carried out on the evacuation and clean-up process.

In the wake of the report, Waveney leader Colin Law praised people’s response to the floods, but said the council was determined to learn lessons and be as well prepared as possible for any future incidents.

The report defends the council stance of not handing out sandbags to residents and businesses, praises the response by council staff and emergency services and partnership agencies and says lessons have been learned in the key areas of information sharing, response and recovery co-ordination and communications.

Waveney’s report also admits that some areas were missed for evacuation and other areas were advised to evacuate in error and that, at its peak, flood waters were only 6cm lower than the 1953 floods disaster.

Notleys in Lowestoft during the tidal surge of December 5, 2013Notleys in Lowestoft during the tidal surge of December 5, 2013

The report, called East Coast Tidal Surge, says: “Overall, the multi-agency response to this crisis worked well. Crucially, unlike 1953, no one died or was seriously injured.

“The council, its staff and members worked around the clock to provide a rapid and effective response during the emergency phase, staffing rest centres and providing front-line support to the public.

“There was significant investment of staff resources during the recovery phase helping to provide the necessary advice, support and funding to help residents and businesses recover from the flooding.”

The tidal surge saw 90 commercial and 60 residential premises in Lowestoft and Oulton Broad flooded and in Southwold seven commercial properties and two homes were flooded,

The report shows the cost of the tidal surge to Waveney was £206,000 and that, in its aftermath, all premises flooded were visited by council staff.

The authority’s operational partners, Waveney Norse, spent an additional 332 crew hours during a clean-up operation which saw 78 tonnes of water-damaged items and material collected free of charge.

However in a “lessons learned” section of the report, the council admits that, as it was not possible to electronically share flood risk maps, some areas were not evacuated while others were evacuated “in error”. It also says an incomplete recovery assessment was carried out before clean-up operations, and media operations could have been improved to provide local information.

The report adds: “There are always lessons to be learned following any incident or exercise and it is important that these are used to amend and improve the council’s emergency response and recovery plans.”

When the tidal surge was about to hit Lowestoft, residents and businesses had complained that the council did not hand out sandbags to protect properties.

But the report described the matter as a “burning issue” which had resulted in highly critical feedback from the community and negative media coverage.

However it adds that two flood review workshops concluded the countywide policy of not handing out sandbags was still appropriate and that more should be done to promote flood awareness and preparedness targeted at homeowners and businesses.

Mr Law, commenting on the report, said: “The December flood was an unparalleled event and brought out the very best in councillors, council staff and community groups who worked tirelessly and around the clock to support those who had been affected.

“That work has continued in the months following the tidal surge with council teams continuing to support residents and businesses in their efforts to return to normal through regular visits and a range of financial schemes to help those in need.

“Every emergency is different and so needs a different response and, while we did our best, we also know that not everything went as well as would have liked. We would not have expected the response and recovery to be perfect, however we are not resting on our laurels and this report reflects our determination to learn important lessons and ensure that we are as well prepared as possible for any future events.”

Mr Law also said: “Those with properties that suffered flooding will be aware of the Repair and Renew scheme which we are managing on behalf of the government which offers up to £5,000 per property for a range of measures such as removable flood boards or gates.”

“These are far more effective than sandbags in preventing water getting through doorways and are much more likely to provide protection during floods.”

The report will be discussed by Waveney’s overview and scrutiny committee on Tuesday to help the council improve its preparedness for any future flooding incidents.

Tod Sullivan was leader of the Labour opposition group at the time of the tidal surge and had asked for the flood response to be examined by the council’s overview and scrutiny committee.

He said: “Everyone in Lowestoft recognises that the tidal surge was a very serious event. There was exceptional work done by staff across the council to ensure that the town was prepared and not worse affected.

“However it is clear that vulnerable communities want to be sure that they are being kept in mind, that they are helped to prepare their homes for future events.

“Also lessons can also be learned about communication and help for those people least able to help themselves.”

The report also says that the government has handed over £160,000 directly to Waveney as a result of the floods and £91,056 had been handed out to businesses and people through the Journal’s sister paper the EDP’s flood appeal.

It also mentions how the first phase of urgent wall repairs to Lowestoft South Beach is due to start shortly with 6,000 tonnes of rocks coming from Norway for the nine-week project.

6 comments

  • Gray Fox, is absolutely right Lowestoft needs to have the same attitude and approach to flood defences as our European neighbours have. Holland regards sea defences as a war that they have to carry on fighting all the time only by doing this can the sea be kept at bay they came to this conclusion after the 1953 floods which decimated parts of Holland (and the UK) and now sea defence is a way of life The Council on Lowestoft are not concerned with sea defences they would rather spend 13 12 million pounds on the building that is not required, £6 million on a footbridge there is not required, and a fortune on reports. I believe that Lowestoft can be flood protected and have a third crossing for the sum of £60 million if the council both in Waveney and Suffolk got behind the project it could fly and work but this Council will not see sense.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Peter Colby

    Saturday, September 6, 2014

  • Funny how Great Yarmouth didn't seem to be aware of the countrywide policy of not handing out sandbags. It's good to know that the 1st phase of urgent wall repairs is due to start shortly. If it takes 9 months to start urgent repairs, how long will the non urgent ones take? I would like to see the lessons learned section of the report, I imagine it would make interesting reading.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    GDL

    Saturday, September 6, 2014

  • Honda centre they had time to move the cars as enough time was given. They are on a flood plain. Same as st johns road half of it is a flood plain I feel sorry for the old folks home they built on the corner " its a flood plain. Wouldn't it be easier to extend one of the piers the north one and create a barrier. Don't forget when there is a surge NO WATER can get out because of the pressure of the water coming in.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    blackcbr

    Saturday, September 6, 2014

  • Had there been an onshore wind that evening the situation could have been far worse. The environment agency's website gives the latest up to date flood risk maps for Lowestoft which give rise for concern. The governments present policy of managed retreat aka abandonment in terms of coastal protection for most parts of the east coast does not help. The only way to ensure that our coastal towns are adequately protected is to design and construct purpose built defences like they have in the Netherlands. I have spoken with a number of business and property owners in Lowestoft, the overall bill for this runs into millions. The human cost is immeasurable. This must not be allowed to happen again. The citizens of Lowestoft deserve better. Having also spoken with a number of people in Yarmouth it seems they had plentiful supplies of sand bags there and they appear to have helped reduce the damage considerably in some areas.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Grey Fox

    Friday, September 5, 2014

  • A report - great! The disaster was well publicised in advance so why were there no council employees monitoring the progress of the flood at 2245 Dec 5th? I biked round from 10pm so it was easy to be prepared. I tried to publicise it by making a facebook event to watch it but was stopped by the police. Clearly they didn't tell the council. Police 0 Fire Service tried to rescue people in St Johns Rd but couldn't wade the flood into Belvedere Rd or make progress down LRS with their boat. Did they get anyone out before morning? Fire Service 0 They knew it was going to happen so why were the council so ill prepared? The council have been asking for photos so clearly got none themselves mor have they taken up my offer to supply the ones I took. Council 0 If no full sandbags were to be provided should not the alternatives have been provided in advance? I hope the report concludes that flood prevention measures are needed urgently. Council -1 I believe that the damage to Ling's car stock would have been much less if the police had allowed untaxed cars to be moved. Apparently they did not - how clever is that? Is that in the report? Police -1 SCCHighways Agency spent millions protecting 200m of A12 from flooding and zero on protecting Lowestoft. SCCHA nil Not a good score line is it? (Posted from Toronto on my phone- that's how much this bugs me)

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    dickhoughton

    Friday, September 5, 2014

  • Without wishing to take anything away from those who did do excellent work, 'lessons have been learned' is a discredited phrase which normally means the exact opposite. Interesting that the picture shows a car show room which, if I remember correctly, complained of the lack of help they received.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    andy

    Friday, September 5, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 12°C

min temp: 11°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT