Search

‘Quick fix’ fears over homes bid for derelict boatyard in Oulton Broad

13:00 15 January 2013

The former Pegasus boat yard site, Oulton Broad.  Plans have been submitted for the site to be turned into housing.  Picture: Nick Butcher

The former Pegasus boat yard site, Oulton Broad. Plans have been submitted for the site to be turned into housing. Picture: Nick Butcher

© Archant 2012

Plans to transform a derelict former boatyard into a new housing development will come under renewed scrutiny tonight, amid claims that the scheme could be a “quick fix” to clean up the site.

shares

Lowestoft-based Badger Building (E Anglia) Ltd submitted revised proposals to the Broads Authority at the end of last year to redevelop the old Pegasus Yachts and Hampton’s Boatyard in Oulton Broad.

Its multi-million pound scheme would see the prominent waterfront site cleared to make way for 76 homes, new boatyard buildings, an office and moorings. But the plans have prompted objections, including one from the Broads Society.

Members of Waveney District Council’s development control committee will be briefed tonight on Badger Building’s proposals for the boatyard off Caldecott Road. Councillors will be asked to assess the application to enable them to make a formal response to the Broads Authority.

Since 2006, several proposals to develop the vacant site have been mooted and withdrawn. The latest blueprint was submitted more than five years after Badger withdrew controversial plans for 151 homes. In September, the company said it hoped its plans would “create a development of lasting quality for this prominent location on the edge of the broad”.

But since the application was lodged more than 80 comments have been made on the Broads Authority’s website – with a number of locals objecting or voicing concerns.

Among them is the Broads Society, which campaigns to safeguard the character of the waterways. In its submission, it says “...this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to develop an important site in the Southern Broads. We would prefer to have to wait a little longer for the right development, rather than rushing to accept the current proposals for the sake of a quick fix to improve the appearance of the site.”

A council report concludes: “This scheme follows the development brief in principle... it is an interesting design but there are a number of design flaws which require reworking and re-examining.”

Officers are recommending members advise the Broads Authority to “negotiate a further revised scheme” and/or work with Badger to address its concerns about the existing plans.

shares

4 comments

  • The proposals are short sighted and based on high density development better suited to London's Dockland. Road access is poor and liable to flooding. Reasonable development, yes. Saturation development, no. The proposals do not serve Oulton Broad well.

    Report this comment

    peter waller

    Tuesday, January 15, 2013

  • You've s[pely Badger wrong.Should be an "O".

    Report this comment

    kevin bacon

    Thursday, January 17, 2013

  • You've s[pely Badger wrong.Should be an "O".

    Report this comment

    kevin bacon

    Thursday, January 17, 2013

  • I've spelt 'spelt' wrongly and your web site isn't working properly.

    Report this comment

    kevin bacon

    Thursday, January 17, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most Read

Campaigns

Most Commented

Overcast

Overcast

max temp: 16°C

min temp: 10°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast

Digital Edition

cover

Enjoy the EDP
digital edition

Subscribe

Broads Outdoor Festival

cover

Enjoy the Broads
Outdoor Festival
digital edition

Read

Eating Out in the Broads

cover

Enjoy the Eating Out
in the Broads
digital edition

Read

Great Days Out

cover

Enjoy the Great Days
Out digital edition

Read