Primie Minister David Cameron’s statement to the House of Commons

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Reaction to today’s findings

All 96 of the inquest verdicts into the fans who died in the Hillsborough disaster should now be quashed and an inquiry called into the deaths, a campaigner urged today.

Sheila Coleman of the Hillsborough Justice Campaign welcomed the apology made by Prime Minister David Cameron.

She told BBC Radio 4’s World at One: “Of course (the apology) is welcome, because it is an acknowledgement that Liverpool, the bereaved families and the fans have been telling the truth for years and yet have been considered liars.”

She added: “Without doubt the inquest verdicts have to be quashed. David Cameron batted this back to the Attorney General. The Attorney General needs to surely, with the evidence presented to him today and the evidence previously presented to him, must quash the inquest verdicts in all cases.

“With the clear evidence that fans could have been saved - and the evidence is there - he needs to give all of those 96 victims their right under law, the right to a fair hearing. It needs a full inquiry into how they died.”

Asked if she believed criminal charges should now be brought, Ms Coleman said: “I do, because all the evidence today shows that South Yorkshire Police and people in South Yorkshire Police lied and operated a cover-up.”

Dave Prentis, leader of Unison, said: “If there is one lesson that should be learnt from Hillsborough, it is that never again should grieving relatives be left to live the nightmare of not knowing the truth.

“It has been cruel and inhumane that they have had to fight to get the truth of what happened to their loved ones.

“We hope that releasing the files will ease their suffering and help to bring some closure. And there is now absolutely no excuse to delay further inquests into the remaining victims.”

Here is the Prime Minister’s Hillsborough statement in full:

Today the Bishop of Liverpool, the Rt Reverend James Jones, is publishing the report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel.

The disaster at the Hillsborough football stadium on 15th April 1989 was one of the greatest peacetime tragedies of the last century.

96 people died as a result of a crush in the Leppings Lane Terrace at the FA Cup Semi-Final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.

There was a public Inquiry at the time by Lord Justice Taylor which found - and I quote - that the main cause of the disaster was “a failure of police control”.

But the Inquiry didn’t have access to all the documents that have since become available, it didn’t properly examine the response of the emergency services, it was followed by a deeply controversial inquest, and by a media version of events that sought to blame the fans.

As a result, the families have not heard the truth and have not found justice.

That is why the previous government - and in particular - the Rt Hon Member for Leigh was right to set up this Panel.

And it is why this government insisted that no stone should be left unturned and that all papers should be made available to the Bishop of Liverpool and his team.

Mr Speaker, in total over 450,000 pages of evidence have been reviewed.

It was right that the families should see the Report first.

As a result the government has only had a very limited amount of time to study the evidence so far.

But it is already very clear that many of the report’s findings are deeply distressing.

There are three areas in particular.

The failure of the authorities to help protect people.

The attempt to blame the fans.

And the doubt cast on the original Coroner’s Inquest.

Let me take each in turn.

FINDINGS: FAILURE OF THE AUTHORITIES

First, there is new evidence about how the authorities failed.

There is a trail of new documents which show the extent to which the safety of the crowd at Hillsborough was “compromised at every level”.

The ground failed to meet minimum standards and the “deficiencies were well known”.

The turnstiles were inadequate.

The ground capacity had been significantly over-calculated.

The crush barriers failed to meet safety standards.

There had been a crush at exactly the same match the year before.

And today’s report shows clearly that lessons had not been learnt.

The report backs up again the key finding of the Taylor Report on police failure.

But it goes further by revealing for the first time the shortcomings of the ambulance and emergency services response.

The major incident plan was not fully implemented.

Rescue attempts were held back by failures of leadership and co-ordination.

And, significantly, new documents today show there was a delay from the emergency services when people were being crushed and killed.

FINDINGS: ATTEMPT TO BLAME THE FANS

Second, the families have long believed that some of the authorities attempted to create a completely unjust account of events that sought to blame the fans for what happened.

Mr Speaker, the families were right.

The evidence in today’s report includes briefings to the media, and attempts by the Police to change the record of events.

On the media. Several newspapers reported false allegations that fans were drunk and violent and stole from the dead.

The Sun’s report sensationalised these allegations under a banner headline “The Truth.”

This was clearly wrong and caused huge offence, distress and hurt.

News International has co-operated with the Panel and, for the first time, today’s report reveals that the source for these despicable untruths was a Sheffield news agency reporting conversations with South Yorkshire Police and Irvine Patnick, the then MP for Sheffield Hallam.

The Report finds that this was part of police efforts - and I quote - “to develop and publicise a version of events that focused on - allegations of drunkenness, ticketlessness and violence.”

In terms of changing the record of events, we already know that police reports were significantly altered but the full extent was not drawn to Lord Justice Taylor’s attention.

Today’s Report finds that 164 statements were significantly amended - and 116 explicitly removed negative comments about the policing operation - including its lack of leadership.

The report also makes important findings about particular actions taken by the police and coroner while investigating the deaths.

There is new evidence which shows that police officers carried out police national computer checks on those who had died in an attempt - and I quote from the report - “to impugn the reputations of the deceased”.

The Coroner took blood alcohol levels from all of the deceased including children.

The Panel finds no rationale whatsoever for what it regards as an “exceptional” decision.

The report states clearly that the attempt of the inquest to draw a link between blood alcohol and late arrival was “fundamentally flawed”.

And that alcohol consumption was “unremarkable and not exceptional for a social or leisure occasion”.

Mr Speaker, over all these years questions have been raised about the role of the government - including whether it did enough to uncover the truth.

It is certainly true that some of the language in the government papers published today was insensitive.

But having been through every document - and every government document including Cabinet Minutes will be published - the Panel found no evidence of any government trying to conceal the truth.

At the time of the Taylor Report the then Prime Minister was briefed by her private secretary that the defensive and - I quote - “close to deceitful” behaviour of senior South Yorkshire officers was “depressingly familiar.”

And it is clear that the then government thought it right that the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire should resign.

But as the Rt Hon Member for Leigh has rightly highlighted, governments then and since have simply not done enough to challenge publicly the unjust and untrue narrative that sought to blame the fans.

FINDINGS: ORIGINAL CORONER’S INQUEST

Third, and perhaps most significantly of all, the Bishop of Liverpool’s report presents new evidence which casts significant doubt over the adequacy of the original Inquest.

The Coroner - on the advice of pathologists - believed that victims suffered traumatic asphyxia leading to unconsciousness within seconds and death within a few minutes.

As a result he asserted that beyond 3.15pm there were no actions that could have changed the fate of the victims and he limited the scope of the Inquest accordingly.

But by analysing post mortem reports the Panel have found that 28 did not have obstruction of blood circulation and 31 had evidence of heart and lungs continuing to function after the crush.

This means that individuals in those groups could have had potentially reversible asphyxia beyond 3.15pm in contrast to the findings of the Coroner and a subsequent Judicial Review.

And the Panel states clearly that “it is highly likely that what happened to those individuals after 3.15pm was significant” in determining whether they died.

RESPONSE

Mr Speaker, the conclusions of this report will be harrowing for many of the families affected.

Anyone who has lost a child knows the pain never leaves you.

But to read a report years afterwards that says - and I quote, “a swifter, more appropriate, better focused and properly equipped response had the potential to save more lives”, can only add to the pain

It is for the Attorney General to decide whether to apply to the High Court to quash the original inquest and seek a new one.

In this capacity he acts independently of government. And he will need to examine the evidence himself.

But it is clear to me that the new evidence in today’s report raises vital questions which must be examined.

And the Attorney General has assured me that he will examine this new evidence immediately and reach a decision as fast as possible.

But ultimately it is for the High Court to decide.

It is also right that the House should have an opportunity to debate the issues raised in this report fully.

My Rt Hon Friend the Home Secretary will be taking forward a debate in Government time. And this will happen when the House returns in October.

APOLOGY

Mr Speaker, I want to be very clear about the view the government takes about these findings and why after 23 years this matters so much, not just for the families but for Liverpool and for our country as a whole.

Mr Speaker what happened that day - and since - was wrong.

It was wrong that the responsible authorities knew Hillsborough did not meet minimum safety standards and yet still allowed the match to go ahead.

It was wrong that the families have had to wait for so long - and fight so hard - just to get to the truth.

And it was wrong that the police changed the records of what happened and tried to blame the fans.

We ask the police to do difficult and often very dangerous things on our behalf.

And South Yorkshire Police is a very different organisation today from what it was then.

But we do the many, many honourable police men and women a great disservice if we try to defend the indefensible.

It was also wrong that neither Lord Justice Taylor nor the Coroner looked properly at the response of the other emergency services.

Again, these are dedicated people who do extraordinary things to serve the public.

But the evidence from today’s report makes very difficult reading.

Mr Speaker, with the weight of the new evidence in this Report, it is right for me today as Prime Minister to make a proper apology to the families of the 96 for all they have suffered over the past 23 years.

Indeed, the new evidence that we are presented with today makes clear that these families have suffered a double injustice.

The injustice of the appalling events - the failure of the state to protect their loved ones and the indefensible wait to get to the truth.

And the injustice of the denigration of the deceased - that they were somehow at fault for their own deaths.

On behalf of the Government - and indeed our country - I am profoundly sorry for this double injustice that has been left uncorrected for so long.

WHY THIS MATTERS FOR MERSEYSIDE AND THE COUNTRY

Mr Speaker, because of what I have described as the second injustice - the false version of events - not enough people in this country understand what the people of Merseyside have been through.

This appalling death toll of so many loved ones lost was compounded by an attempt to blame the victims.

A narrative about hooliganism on that day was created which led many in the country to accept that it was somehow a grey area.

Today’s report is black and white.

The Liverpool fans “were not the cause of the disaster”.

The Panel has quite simply found “no evidence” in support of allegations of “exceptional levels of drunkenness, ticketlessness or violence among Liverpool fans”, “no evidence that fans had conspired to arrive late at the stadium” and “no evidence that they stole from the dead and dying.”

Mr Speaker, I’m sure the whole House will want to thank the Bishop of Liverpool and his Panel for all the work they have done.

And I am sure that all sides will join with me in paying tribute to the incredible strength and dignity of the Hillsborough families and the community which has backed them in their long search for justice.

While nothing can ever bring back those who have been lost with all the documents revealed and nothing held back the families, at last, have access to the truth.

And I commend this Statement to the House.

8 comments

  • For the 96 Never Forgotten and now some justice is being served but why has the wait been so long? Cameron's aplogy was dignified and was all that could be expected of him, how the government and judiciary now deal with the matter now is also very important. YNWA & OTBC

    Report this comment

    Jakarta Canary

    Thursday, September 13, 2012

  • The point? I do not support Conservative politics neither am I a fan of David Cameron, especially after he had once said that the search for the truth was a bit like ‘a blind man in dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there’. I have to say I watched with a (restricted) degree of admiration how our Prime Minister made his statement, issued his apology and then answered questions, some of which were not possible to answer until all the evidence has been examined thoroughly. (I also very aware that he is a political animal.) But that feeling I had, when I heard him say that on behalf of the Government and the country he was profoundly sorry, I find very difficult to describe. Simultaneous joy and sorrow? I don’t know but it was very moving. I have always been very proud of my Liverpool and Irish roots and my association has always gone beyond my association through birth and mere football. It always provided me with my sense of identification, especially when living and travelling alone or going through a few tough times. Yesterday that bond was made even stronger with the respect to those who did so much and went through so much to bring about THE TRUTH after 23 years of struggle. That apology recognises that we, those who believed, were right and our friends and families so tragically affected can now work towards some form of 'closure'. The point, John L Norton, is that it mattered to those who have fought so hard to clear those who were being falsely blamed for their own deaths!!!!! If that apology means nothing to you, why ask?

    Report this comment

    micklynn

    Thursday, September 13, 2012

  • Just what is the point of Cameron apologising?

    Report this comment

    John L Norton

    Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  • Cameron was apologizing as Prime Minister, representing the government of this country and, perhaps the other governments that ignored this matter. What is scandalous is why it has taken so long to find out the truth. Let us hope the government andor the judiciary do not shrink from the next action that is needed, which is to bring to justice those who tried to cover up their own negligence and caused such hurt to bereaved people. As I read through some of the statements on the bbc web site I was astounded and upset that the disaster and the lies were allowed to happen.

    Report this comment

    Sprowstonboy

    Thursday, September 13, 2012

  • Cameron was apologizing as Prime Minister, representing the government of this country and, perhaps the other governments that ignored this matter. What is scandalous is why it has taken so long to find out the truth. Let us hope the government andor the judiciary do not shrink from the next action that is needed, which is to bring to justice those who tried to cover up their own negligence and caused such hurt to bereaved people. As I read through some of the statements on the bbc web site I was astounded and upset that the disaster and the lies were allowed to happen.

    Report this comment

    Sprowstonboy

    Thursday, September 13, 2012

  • Cameron was apologizing as Prime Minister, representing the government of this country and, perhaps the other governments that ignored this matter. What is scandalous is why it has taken so long to find out the truth. Let us hope the government andor the judiciary do not shrink from the next action that is needed, which is to bring to justice those who tried to cover up their own negligence and caused such hurt to bereaved people. As I read through some of the statements on the bbc web site I was astounded and upset that the disaster and the lies were allowed to happen.

    Report this comment

    Sprowstonboy

    Thursday, September 13, 2012

  • Rest in Peace Brothers Rest in Peace

    Report this comment

    Cannock Canary

    Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  • Just what is the point of Cameron apologising?

    Report this comment

    John L Norton

    Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Related links

Other News Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Overcast

Overcast

max temp: 13°C

min temp: 6°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT