“We can’t go on like this” - £4.6bn case for Norwich to London rail investment is published
PUBLISHED: 07:42 04 November 2014 | UPDATED: 07:48 04 November 2014
Archant © 2012
“We can’t go on like this” - Chancellor George Osborne will be told in a business-backed dossier making the argument for a £476m infrastructure investment in the rail link between Norwich and London.
Why investment in our line is needed
Some of the UK’s oldest carriages on the network - average age is 25 years
It is one of the slowest main lines in the UK - average speed of services is 63mph.
Only 84pc of trains run to time against a target of 93pc.
18pc of passengers arriving at London Liverpool Street in the morning peak hour already have to stand. Forecasts show that demand into Liverpool Street from stations in Suffolk and Norfolk expected to grow by 32pc.
Greater Anglia is the second least subsidised railway company in the UK, receiving only 1.5p per passenger mile, against a national average of 12.5p per passenger mile.
The level of investment for GEML services is disproportionate to the costs that commuters and passengers pay.
The business case published today - which will land on a number of top Government desks - sets out the potential £4.5bn payback from allowing passengers to reach London from Norwich in 90 minutes, more reliably, and in newer carriages.
Senior figures will be told that missing the crucial opportunity for investment will “stifle growth”, “run our service into the ground” and will condemn passengers to “at least another decade of misery”.
It comes just under a year after Mr Osborne travelled to Norwich to request a taskforce of business leaders, MPs, transport officials and infrastructure firm Network Rail, should set up a taskforce to set out how faster and more reliable train journeys could be achieved.
The taskforce has found that investment of half a billion pounds could transform East Anglia’s main rail line – and create tens of thousands of jobs for the region.
What the taskforce is asking for?
£476m investment to improve essential infrastructure by 2020 - including track, signalling and overhead line equipment.
This would enable trains to travel at up to 110mph on the line – the existing locomotives can run at these speeds in other parts of the country.
The increased speeds would enable trains from Liverpool Street to reach Chelmsford in 25 minutes, Colchester in 40 minutes, Ipswich in 60 minutes, Stowmarket in 70 minutes, Diss in 80 minutes, and Norwich in 90 minutes.
New faster and improved rolling stock to be included in the new rail franchise tender.
The cost of new trains is not included in the figure, but the campaign is asking that providing new trains is part of the specification for the new franchise which is due to start in 2016 – the new trains themselves would be likely to be delivered between 2018 and 2021.
Level crossing upgrades without compromising safety (in the current spending period)
Improved capacity and better timetable to give an hourly 90 minute service to Norwich, with benefit along the line
Electrification of the Felixstowe to Nuneaton line to release freight capacity for passenger services between Ipswich and London.
It’s business case claims that each pound invested in the line will bring almost £10 in economic benefit for the region – four times the cost/benefit figure for the proposed HS2 line from London to the midlands and north of England.
In a letter to the Chancellor, New Anglia chairman Mark Pendlington and Norwich MP Chloe Smith said: “We could be the California of Europe, yet we have some of the oldest trains in Britain and our passengers pay some of the highest fares to subsidise other lines in the country.
“Our rail service is over-crowded, the infrastructure is not resilient to failures. It is as quick to go 225 miles over land and sea from London to Brussels as it is to travel on the train from London to Norwich, half the distance.”
Next month Mr Osborne will set out his mini-budget, and the co-chairs added: “The Chancellor’s decision for this Autumn Statement is simple: we ask him to confirm the infrastructure improvements needed to unlock the economic potential of the region through faster and more reliable services; and provide for new rolling stock on the Great Eastern Main Line for better journeys.”
The business case claims that proposals will create 8,200 new jobs in Norwich, just under 10,000 new jobs in Ipswich, some 16,000 new jobs in helmsford and 14,000 in Colchester.
Labour’s shadow transport secretary Mary Creagh said her party wanted better services on the Great Eastern Main Line, adding: “David Cameron will be judged on his actions, not words”.
She claimed that Government caused chaos in the franchising programme has led to three short term contracts on the route since 2010, and delayed investment in trains.
Adding: “A Labour government will cap rail fares, legislate for a public sector operator, devolve the running of regional and local services and deliver a railway which puts passengers first.”
Norwich candidates Jessica Asato said: “Labour strongly supports improvements to the Great Eastern Main Line and belated investment from the Government would of course be welcome.
“The social and economic case for investment in the East is compelling, but if, as Chloe Smith MP has stated, the money is already there, why hasn’t the Government taken the opportunity in the last four years to get the ball rolling? This does nothing to help Norfolk commuters on overcrowded unreliable trains who have been hit by inflation-busting fare increases of 20pc since 2010.”
Clive Lewis, who is standing for Labour in Norwich South, said: “Alongside the need for greater investment, Labour would address passenger concerns about the cost of fares and the quality of service by introducing a public sector rail operator to take on rail franchises, as well as devolving control of regional rail to local authorities to ensure greater transport integration.”
Do you have a story about the railway? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org