Tory MP clash averted in East Anglia

06:30 30 January 2013

Prime minister David Cameron lost the vote on boundary changes last night.  Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

Prime minister David Cameron lost the vote on boundary changes last night. Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

The prospect of a scrap amongst East Anglian Tories was averted yesterday after the House of Commons rejected plans to introduce new constituency boundaries before the 2015 election.

The changes would have seen some Conservative MPs vying with party colleagues to be selected in new seats set out under the changes, while others might have seen their potential majorities increased or reduced.

But David Cameron had wanted the changes none the less, because overall it is thought they would have delivered an electoral advantage to his party come the election in 2015.

However, MPs voted by 334 to 292, a majority of 42, to delay a review until 2018.

Liberal Democrat MPs voted against the prime minister’s will in retaliation for backbench Tories sabotaging House of Lords reform last year. But the rebellion was greeted with anger from Conservative backbenchers.

Senior Tory MP Peter Bone said: “We [allowed] a vote on AV in return for the Liberal Democrats supporting us on boundary reviews, that was the deal breaker.

“Our party kept to that deal, they’ve gone back, they are a disgrace.”

The number of MPs in Norfolk would not have changed under the proposals, which the government said aimed to equalise the number of voters in each constituency.

However the creation of a new seat crossing the border of Norfolk and Cambridgeshire paved the way for potential conflict between two MPs.

The new Wisbech and Downham Market constituency would have taken in part of the South West Norfolk seat currently held by Elizabeth Truss and some of the North East Cambridgeshire seat held by Stephen Barclay - both current constituencies would have disappeared.

Elsewhere in Norfolk, the Boundary Commission said changes were needed to Norwich North, Great Yarmouth and North Norfolk to leave them with the right number of voters.

To enable that to happen, Dereham would have become part of a revamped Broadland and Dereham constituency, while Taverham North and South, plus Drayton North and South would have left Broadland to become part of Norwich North.

Elsewhere Fakenham would have switched to North Norfolk, while three wards currently in North Norfolk - Stalham and Sutton, Waterside and Waxham - would have moved to an extended Great Yarmouth constituency.


  • Not so "V", there are enough lobby groups and other outside interests for at least 600 get get a decent whack on top of their basic MP's package. I think it's jolly rotten of the Libor Dems, I mean if one can't fiddle the boundaries to gain electoral advantage when in power one might almost question the point of going into coalition with those losers in the first place.

    Report this comment

    Mr Cameron Isaliar

    Wednesday, January 30, 2013

  • What is wanted is considerably less MP's. 600+ for a small country like this. What do they do all day ?. Force them to work harder and pay them less expenses.

    Report this comment


    Wednesday, January 30, 2013

  • peter Bone is a bonehead. His deal aside, he thought voters had no idea of what proportionality meant and would support such 'ultimatum', take it or leave it. Boundary changes don't make for proportionality, but for party political advances, only a proportional voting system can really give us a fair voting system and it would make frequent and costly boundary changes unnecessary. House of Commons and Lords reforms? when?

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Wednesday, January 30, 2013

  • I have no problem of what MPs do all day the ones in Norfolk work very hard in my opinion, what does bother me is the Tories have to get 1million more votes to be equal to Labour and thats not right. It should be a level playing field and maybe more people would vote. I know some people will moan so why not put yourself forward as an MP or even a councillor and then you can be with which ever party you want

    Report this comment

    Sweet cheeks

    Wednesday, January 30, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most Read

Featured Pages

Most Commented

Latest from the EDP



max temp: 7°C

min temp: 1°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition


Enjoy the EDP
digital edition


Newsletter Sign Up