Rents for Norwich council house tenants are set to increase.
Thousands of council house tenants in Norwich face rent increase
Dan Grimmer
Thursday, February 14, 2013
6:30 AM
Thousands of council house tenants in Norwich are facing a steep rise in their rents, with city leaders saying the increase is needed to help maintain existing homes and build new ones.
Council leaders last night edged nearer to an average rent rise of 5.1pc for the city’s 15,000 council house tenants from April, which will see an average of £3.69 added to weekly rents.
More than 10,400 people will see their rents increase by between £3.50 and £4.49 a week and council leaders acknowledge some tenants will be hit hard by the increase and could even be forced onto benefits as a result.
But they say the increase is vital to generate cash so the authority can keep investing in council homes to bring them up to scratch, such as by putting in new windows, kitchens, bathrooms, boilers and doors.
And they say, by increasing the rents this time around, it makes it more likely that any rises can be kept down in 2014/15, when the council fears housing benefit reforms will lead to more people finding themselves in arrears.
Officers, in the report which came before councillors last night, warned: “The financial impact of the increases will fall hardest on those just above the benefit entitlement threshold, either impacting on their disposable income or forcing them into benefit.”
And Victoria MacDonald, cabinet member for housing at the city council, said: “We are very much aware that in straightened times increasing rent is difficult. But this year’s recommendation falls below that of the previous two years.
“It’s very important that we maximise investment in the housing stock and that we are able to build our first council houses so we can offer more people secured tenancies.”
She said 59pc of tenants get housing benefit and in most cases that will rise to cover the rent increase.
Other options the cabinet considered, but rejected, were for a 3.8pc increase and a 2.5pc increase. They said that would lead to losses of £749,000 and £1.5m respectively.
The council said it had consulted with tenant representatives. The officer report stated: “Many tenants appreciate that rent increases are inevitable if the level of investment is to be maintained.
“However, there are concerns about the effect of higher increases on those struggling in the current financial climate.”
Claire Stephenson, leader of the opposition Green group questioned whether tenants were happy with the increase. Mrs MacDonald said the council had talked to the Tenants’ CityWide board, which includes tenants’ representatives.
She said: “What we have discussed, and what tenants are content with, is that the increase needs to be reflected in continued improvement to homes.”
She said the council planned to spend more than £34.8m on housing in 2013/14, including more than 1,500 new kitchens, more than a 1,000 new heating systems or boilers and 1,320 window installations.
The rent increase for the next 12 months comes on top of last year’s average rent increase of 6.85pc, which added an average of £4.60 per week to council tenants’ rent.
The cabinet also agreed to recommend to full council that the city council’s share of the council tax should increase by 1.95pc - a fraction below the level of rise which would have triggered a referendum.
Alan Waters, deputy leader of the council, said the increase was needed to help protect council services, with the council’s budget looking to make £2.5m of savings over the next year.
The council says, in consultation carried out between September and December last year, 57.4pc of people supported a council tax hike, with “the most popular” use for it to protect key council services.
The increase would mean, from April, somebody living in a Band D property would have to pay £230.27 into City Hall’s coffers, an increase of £4.40 on the current level.
A final decision on the rent increase and the council tax hike will be made at a full city council meeting next Tuesday night.
• Are you a council tenant with a view on the rents increase? Call Norwich Evening News reporter Dan Grimmer on 01603 772375 or email eveningnewsletters@archant.co.uk
Other Politics Articles
- UKIP target Great Yarmouth in general election
- Green Party offer to break Norfolk County Council deadlock by changing decision-making system rejected by Conservatives
- Fresh hope for development of Pinebanks site in Thorpe St Andrew
- Cromer, Felbrigg, Aylmerton and Runton join forces over ‘danger’ road
- “Never mind Ricky van Wolfswinkel at Norwich City, this is Rip van Winkel.” - Ian Gibson warns that this is no time for Norfolk County Council to be sleeping
- Lib Dem defector says: ‘Judge me by my actions’
- End this stalemate before businesses suffer - warning over limbo at Norfolk County Council
- Cromer councillors oppose flats scheme for older people
- War of words over failed Norfolk County Council coalition deal
- Hopes for UK’s greenest building to be built in Norwich are approved
- Closing submissions under way at King’s Lynn incinerator public inquiry
- Peer’s ‘bedroom tax’ arrears warning to Lords
- Future of Norfolk town to be discussed at a public meeting
- New Diss mayor vows to keep the town at the forefront of minds
- Update: Former leader of Lib Dems on North Norfolk District Council joins Conservatives
Most Read News Stories See all
Facebook appeal for blackspot action after man killed on A47 at Scarning, near Dereham
Nearly 3,000 people have supported a Facebook campaign demanding safety improvements on the A47 near Dereham set up after the latest fatal crash.
- Name of man who died at Castle Mall shopping centre in Norwich is confirmed
- The Force steps in: Sci-fi fans turn to the dark side in clash at Norwich Star Wars convention
- Four seriously injured after crash in Norwich
- Tributes left to man who died at Castle Mall in Norwich
- Letter in full: Ofsted express “considerable concern” following inspection of 28 Norfolk schools
ADVERTISEMENT
11 comments
So nice of you to recycle and regurgitate this story from earlier in the week. Come on you lot, get stuck into those wicked Trots with renewed vigour. No sign of PaulH yet, damn shame, what what.
Report this comment
Mr Cameron Isaliar
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Why not hike rent for those who require regular remedial works and refurbs (as a result of their inability to look after council homes), and reduce rents for those that do look after them? It seems that those who look after their council properies are punished, wheras those who trash the place regulalry get new kitchens, bathrooms etc because they're in such a poor state.
Report this comment
DC1
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Still cheap rent compared to private sector then allowed to buy for peanuts - what a win win they`re on.
Report this comment
spark
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Why aren't council house tenants made to pay a large deposit prior to to being housed? This would ensure that they treated the property with respect , or at least go a long way to paying for any refurbishment necessary when they vacate.
Report this comment
Colonel Grumpfuttock-Horseposture (retired)
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Tenants representatives have given the thumbs up? In my experience these reps are kept sweet with perks, I question that they have been consulting on this increase. The increases in Councillors and Ms. Arthur's allowances is obscene, this from a former chairwoman of age concern. Self interest and decision making without mandate now marks most of Norfolk's councils.
Report this comment
ingo wagenknecht
Thursday, February 14, 2013
PaddyNR1, rubbish...all the info is here, new blah,blah,blah...yet if you delve into historical data and news items from the internet, you'll find that the last nuLabour government had already funded the new windows and decent homes programs up till 2016...i smell rats and pocket filling.
Report this comment
nrg
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Noah Vale - Spot on. Far too many council tenants do not look after their properties and the cost of putting them right when they move out is horrendous. I live in GYBC and regularly see Norse turn up at vacated flats in their droves to do remedial work, which sometimes is a full refit because the last tenant has literally trashed the place. But then they don`t have to pick up the bill do they. That`s left to the rest of us tax payers.
Report this comment
BG
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Don't lose sight of what drives this: central government's cutting back of local authorities' budgets. 30% and counting since 2010.
Report this comment
PaddyNR1
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Well someone has got to pay for the increase in the councillors allowances. What did Brenda Arthur now get...... a 54% increase, yes absolutely scandalous.
Report this comment
Joe Mullets Uncle
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Another thing - if the council didn't have to spend thousands of pounds refurbishing houses when some of their 'tenants' moved out , the rents would be significantly lower.
Report this comment
Colonel Grumpfuttock-Horseposture (retired)
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Nobody is forced to pay council house rent - it's easy enough to go & rent a property in the private sector.
Report this comment
Colonel Grumpfuttock-Horseposture (retired)
Thursday, February 14, 2013