Breckland Council has defended its decision not to wait for the outcome of crucial elections in Great Yarmouth before committing its most senior officer’s time to a failed project to merge senior staff.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Breckland already shares high-level officers with South Holland Council and spent six months developing plans to include staff from Yarmouth, despite its Labour group’s pledge to scrap the idea if it took control in May.

Labour won the election after taking four Conservative seats, and abandoned the policy.

Six Yarmouth Borough Council staff spent an estimated 276 hours, worth about £10,000, on the project and claimed more than £1,000 in expenses, according to information released under the Freedom of Information Act.

Breckland Council said it did not incur any direct costs from the project, and said it could not calculate the indirect costs of the time joint Breckland and South Holland chief executive Terry Huggins spent in discussions with Yarmouth.

The EDP has asked for more information in an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act.

Breckland Labour leader Terry Jermy said: “We debated this in March and they knew then the election was taking place in May and there was a very real risk of a change. The Labour group there had consistently opposed shared services. To charge ahead and spend a considerable amount of money for what – it seems very unnecessary.”

Breckland leader William Nunn said the project would have saved Breckland £120,000 a year and £700,000 across the three councils.

He said this was worth Mr Huggins, who is paid up to £124,000, committing this time before the election despite the uncertainty about whether the scheme would go ahead.

He said: “The only cost involved comes in Terry’s personal time, over and beyond the call of duty. Did it take his mind off other things? Undoubtedly for a period of time.

“Bearing in mind the savings were close to £700,000, if we had waited another six months in effect we would have lost £350,000. Yes, we spent £10,000 but we had the potential to save £350,000 and that we a risk worth taking.”

He said the council was currently in discussions about sharing services with a number of other councils, both in and outside Norfolk.

3 comments

  • Breckland Council, Yarmouth Council. Not a marriage made in heaven. I could have told you that and wouldn't have even charge for the phone call.

    Report this comment

    alecto

    Tuesday, August 21, 2012

  • And these are the same people who said vociferously that a unitary authority wouldn't work and wouldn't save any money. Given the NCC versus KLWNBC fiasco, the Murphy scandal, and the other spats between the district councils I can only say it could not have been any worse and it would have had the benefit of predictability and certainty.

    Report this comment

    JCW

    Monday, August 20, 2012

  • All money for mates isn't it? As the merger was Council business wouldn't a Chief Exec consider this part of his remit, for which he is paid £124,000, I wouldn't think a man in that role should claim 'overtime'!

    Report this comment

    Canary Boy

    Monday, August 20, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 20°C

min temp: 13°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT