Poll: Do you agree with the Hunting Act? Should it be repealed?
PUBLISHED: 11:18 28 December 2014 | UPDATED: 11:18 28 December 2014
Archant © 2011 01603 772434
Ten years ago the Hunting Act had been passed and hunts in the region were setting off before the ban came into force the following February. With a general election looming, political editor Annabelle Dickson asks what impact the ban has had, and if things are likely to change after next May’s election.
With the result of the next general election so uncertain, the future of fox hunting is even less settled.But one thing is becoming clearer. If the UK Independence Party does hold the balance of power, supporters of the activity should not be too optimistic about the prospects of overturning the ban.
Douglas Carswell, one of the party’s two MPs, has said the legislation should remain in place. The East Anglian MP, who defected from the Conservatives earlier this year, said he believed there were much more pressing issues facing the area, also claiming it was not realistic that his own party’s policy to hold a referendum in each county on the issue would see a ban overturned in Essex.
Speaking ahead of today’s Boxing Day hunts, the University of East Anglia graduate said: “killing small fluffy animals is not something that I am really in favour of”.
He will put himself at odds with the pro-hunting lobby which hopes that the election will herald an overturning of the ban on fox-hunting.
View from a hunt – Charles Carter, master of West Norfolk Foxhounds
Charles Carter, master of West Norfolk Foxhounds, said: “Ten years after the act was passed there are still hundreds of thousands of people showing their support – following their local packs on this prestigious Boxing Day meet.
“We are still here, we are still hunting, but the repeal of the Hunting Act is still necessary. It isn’t acceptable.
“The support is still strong. More than a quarter of a million people are expected to turn out on Boxing Day this year.”
He said millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money had been wasted on spurious allegations against people in his position around the country.
“This is not a law that one wants on the statue books. One that is driven by class politics and prejudice, not animal welfare or cruelty.
“That is why the law is unworkable,” he added.
He acknowledged that people would say there were much more serious issues in the country to deal with.
“We have never suggested that hunting is one of the biggest issues facing the country at the moment. It is a bad law and passing laws, as was proven with this one, is very time consuming. Getting rid of them or amending them is not time consuming.”
Tim Bonner, from the pro-hunting Countryside Alliance, blasted UKIP’s policy, saying it was “possibly the most idiotic policy on hunting that it is capable of imagining”.
“They want county by county referendums on whether hunting should be legal. Why it would be cruel to hunt a fox in Suffolk but okay in Essex? And how do you stop your hounds when you reach the border? I’m not quite sure.
“Along with many areas of their rural policy, I think people, once they look beyond Nigel Farage’s tweed jacket, find there is very little of substance in UKIP’s rural agenda.
But UKIP leader Nigel Farage said Tim Bonner seemed to be “lashing out against himself”.
Mid Norfolk MP George Freeman’s view
None of us want to see any cruelty or unnecessary suffering to animals and we all want a legal basis for stamping that out; but an outright ban which criminalises our traditional hunts which do so much good work in the countryside on vermin control and management of the fox population, as well as maintenance of the country-side, seems to me to be the wrong approach.
Foxes are not cuddly pets. The fox population needs to be controlled. All the evidence suggests that control of the fox population by hunts is the least harmful and most reliable method, compared to shooting or poisoning or trapping which are often far crueller.
From the evidence I see here in Mid Norfolk, I believe we should repeal or amend the ban to focus on stamping out and criminalising any acts of deliberate cruelty and welfare abuses rather than criminalising large swathes of our rural community in an attack on our rural heritage. We should be driven by the evidence on what is the most humane and effective way to manage fox populations
“He was clearly conned by the Tories in 2010 when the Countryside Alliance poured in massive resources and delivered hundreds of thousands of leaflets for the Conservatives.
“The results of which have been nothing, no change in the law, no free vote, nothing at all. Conversely, what UKIP offer with our planned county- based referendums is a chance for rural people to have their say. It’s simple, it is about democracy.”
A free vote on fox hunting was agreed in the coalition manifesto, subject to parliamentary time, but the Government has privately acknowledged that with just a few months until the election it will not take place this parliament.
But while the Conservatives have not yet published their manifesto, environment secretary Elizabeth Truss has voiced her support for a repeal.
Labour candidate for Mid Norfolk Harry Clarke’s view
Wildlife needs protecting and we must do more to ensure their habitat has a chance to thrive. Nature cannot be left in the hands of those who believe blood sport is right or needed. I am a candidate in a rural seat, and have unbroken rural ties going back 236 years, I am though against hunting as a blood sport. For me it is both a practical and a moral issue. I am against cruelty and suffering to animals wherever practicably possible (including the badger cull).It is a myth that rural folk support hunting. Recent incidents in Mid-Norfolk have involved a local hunt rampaging across a churchyard in Swanton Morley. The current Conservative MP George Freeman has stated that the Hunting Act takes up police time, and I’m sure would vote for it to be scrapped. People still commit burglary but you do not hear calls for that law to be ended. As with any law we can’t pick and choose which to obey. I hope the Act is here to stay. I don’t think it will be a major issue in 2015, but for many voters it may tilt their final views – wherever they live. If I was elected as an MP, I would vote to keep the Hunting Act, as would a Labour government.
“People should have the freedom to hunt. We’ve said that when parliamentary time allows there will be a free vote on this issue and I am personally committed to voting for repeal of the current legislation.”
Mr Carswell said: “This is not even in my top 100 priorities, let alone top 10 priorities. We don’t need a change in the law. I think leave things as they are. I personally would leave the ban in place as it is a the moment. When you go out with the hunt, ask yourself what it is that they want to do, that they can’t do.
“People in Clacton and Frinton and Walton, they want me to try to fix the ambulance response times, they don’t want me to get involved in a debate on a ban on ending hunting.”
Asked about his previous support for fox hunting as member of the Conservative Party, he said; “It was party policy and I went along with it. But killing small fluffy animals is not something that I am really in favour of. My general view is that if you are going to hunt something eat it, but we don’t eat foxes. My view is leave the ban in place.”
• Should the Hunting Act be repealed? Write (giving your full contact details) to: The Letters Editor, EDP, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich NR1 1RE or email EDPLetters@archant.co.uk