Search

Lowestoft lap dancing club plan is rejected

08:47 02 December 2014

Plans for a lap dancing and pole dancing club in the Bank Stores building in Lowestoft have been rejected.

Plans for a lap dancing and pole dancing club in the Bank Stores building in Lowestoft have been rejected.

© archant 2012

A decision to reject plans for a lap dancing and pole dancing club in Lowestoft has been welcomed by its opponents.

shares

Waveney District Council’s licensing sub committee voted unanimously against an application to open Jessy Fantail in the former Bank Stores pub, in Commercial Road, on November 21.

Applicants Hazel Wilson and Stephen Barrett were given the go-ahead to open the Candy Lounge Gentleman’s Club in nearby Station Square in February and said they would surrender that licence if they received approval to open in Bank Stores.

Speaking after the meeting, committee member Sarah Webb said councillors felt the location of the latest venue at the gateway to the town and close to residential properties was inappropriate.

Christ Church Lowestoft and Lowestoft Town Pastors were among hundreds of people, also including residents, councillors and businesses, to object the proposals.

The Rev Matthew Payne, vicar of Christ Church and a member of the town pastors committee, attended the licensing meeting.

He said: “I think it is a good decision for the town.

“Although it is only 100 yards away from the previous application, it is a very different location.

“A family with children live in the next door building and there is also the Bridge View Centre nearby where there are vulnerable people.”

Mr Payne said there were also moral objections to the proposed sex venue, which were not allowed to be considered as part of the licensing application process.

He said: “It is basically something that degrades women for the titillation and stimulation of men.

“In this day and age, with all our emphasis on equality, it seems extraordinary to me that this would be allowed.”

Janet Craig, Waveney district councillor for the Harbour Ward, also welcomed the licensing committee’s decision, saying she was pleased with the result, especially for the families living nearby.

She said: “The residents are really pleased because they thought they were going to be forced to move.

“They are not all on benefits. Some of them are working in low paid jobs and they don’t have many choices of where they can live.

“For the town generally, the appearance of Commercial Road and Station Square area is improving generally and it would have been a backward step. I also think it could put off visitors to the town. People who visit Lowestoft aren’t looking for that kind of thing.”

shares

7 comments

  • I think the decision to reject this pole dancing club is excellent. About giving people a living?That's absolute nonsense. I know someone who has a full time job and she pole dances and her biggest earner at these clubs are when she gives PRIVATE showings. It's disgusting !! These places are not for Lowestoft and never will be . Keep rejecting as long as you like. We don't want any seedy clubs like this here.

    Report this comment

    treesrgreen

    Friday, December 5, 2014

  • Who said anything about the pole dancers being women... ...it could have been men dancers!!! Being serious, these clubs do bring a sleazy image along with them so it's probably best it was rejected. VIP passes for the councillors next time might help the application process!!!!

    Report this comment

    Parsnip

    Wednesday, December 3, 2014

  • We have places like this in Aberdeen, one is almost next door to a casino that we use. You would not know that it is any different to any other pubclub in the street. The people going in and out are exactly the same as the guys going into the pub next door. According to local papers, the girls earn a really good living by dancing, no contact is allowed and they do not feel degraded. It gives them a chance to have a better life, buy a nouse etc when otherwise they would be in low paid jobs barely surviving. People who object on these grounds should ask the dancers first before spouting their ideological left wing rubbish.

    Report this comment

    DaveG

    Wednesday, December 3, 2014

  • So Peter Aldous won't be getting all those ministerial visits he'd hoped for in the run up to the 2015GE after all...

    Report this comment

    Mr Cameron Spork-Pies

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • I think this is a good decision, but I'm puzzled as to why they got any approvals in the first place. I thought Lowestoft had a regulation against sex industry establishments coming into town. From what I understood, that was an adopted council rule from decades ago that was enacted to keep Lowestoft "family friendly". If I'm wrong on this, please correct me. As to the comments about neighbors being on benefits or not...it's irrelevant. ALL people deserve a safe neighborhood and it's very snobby to say that "it's good enough for them." That's the attitude the council has taken with Kirkley. Remember the drug rehab brouhaha? they're still there. It's not pleasant. I remember a church group member from Beccles who supported the center financially saying at a meeting that "those people in Kirkley won't mind". Well, yes, we do. If an establishment isn't good enough to open next to your house, then it's not good enough to open in any area where people live.

    Report this comment

    ATaylor

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • Like Lucioperca, I think this is a good decision - if a somewhat surprising one. However, I do not see that this location is “very different” from the 'Candy Lounge' in Station Square. The arguments which have influenced this decision surely apply to Station Square where an application was approved. It is unfortunate that Mr Payne chose to object on “moral grounds”. His valid objection against the degradation and potential exploitation of women would have been better expressed solely as an equality issue in this context. I'm afraid that once you enter the realms of “titillation” you have almost certainly lost your case! I am disappointed to read Janet Craig's comment that “They are not all on benefits.” Why should this be in any way relevant to whether or not one finds oneself suddenly living in close proximity to a lap-dancing club?

    Report this comment

    point du jour

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • I am as 'red blooded' as the next man but I do think this is a good decision. Personally speaking I think these clubs do very little for us as a society and have a large part to play in some of the mysogenistic attitudes our younger men display these days.

    Report this comment

    Lucioperca

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most Read

Featured Pages

Most Commented

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 9°C

min temp: 5°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast
HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

cover

Enjoy the EDP
digital edition

Subscribe

Newsletter Sign Up