The world wars were a long time ago I know. But I suppose it’s testament to how culturally embedded they are in the UK that when a committee of the British Parliament calls on Germany to be more militarily active it makes one double take.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

But that is just what the House of Lords Committee on the European Union is doing in its report on defence capabilities in the EU today.

It points out that with the US expecting Europe to take on more defence responsibilities, Britain and France need Germany to help shoulder some of the burden.

The document reads: “Germany is Europe’s economic powerhouse. But in the military area, it does not fulfil its potential despite a large defence budget in absolute terms. It is a precondition that Germany becomes a more active participant in European defence matters, able to engage on similar terms to the UK and France, if the EU is to have an effective security and defence policy. NATO would benefit equally.”

Apparently the Germans do have “fully fledged” armed forces militarily speaking, but it never uses them because people there have “historical and cultural objections”.

1 comment

  • Germany's military spending is not directed by the House ogf Lords but by the threats it faces versus the capapbilities needed. If Britain can except a European peace and defense force that is not directed by US or Israeli foreign policy goals, the 'historical and cultural objections' always cited, might melt away. A European defense force could be just that, not necessarrily a NATO vasall or aligned to any other military block.

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Friday, May 4, 2012

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Sunny

Sunny

max temp: 26°C

min temp: 18°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT