Controversial modern farmhouse plan at Blakeney recommended for approval

10:28 03 September 2014

A view of the Glaven Valley from Bridgefoot Lane, Wiveton, which the Glaven Valley Protection Group fears would be spoilt if the farmhouse application is approved. Picture: SUBMITTED.

A view of the Glaven Valley from Bridgefoot Lane, Wiveton, which the Glaven Valley Protection Group fears would be spoilt if the farmhouse application is approved. Picture: SUBMITTED.


Plans for a contemporary-style “farmstead” in a north Norfolk Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) are being recommended for approval - despite more than 100 objections and the formation of a pressure group.

$element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value

The scheme would see an L-shaped, two-and-a-half storey house, with five bedrooms, built at Three Owls Farm, Saxlingham Road, Blakeney.

Objectors writing to North Norfolk District Council (NNDC) repeatedly describe the building as too large, “brutalist”, “industrial”, and a “blot on the landscape”.

They fear it would create a precedent in the AONB, which also houses the Glaven Valley conservation area, and claim the scheme contravenes a raft of NNDC planning policies designed to protect the area.

Wiveton Parish Council has said, if approved by NNDC planners on September 4, it would seek a judicial review. Blakeney Parish Council is also against the scheme.

Applicant Kathy Cargill submitted revised plans for the site after concerns that an earlier farmhouse design was too tall.

An existing 1950s bungalow, outbuildings and barn would be demolished as part of the scheme.

The farmstead, intended as a family home, would be built in soft Norfolk red bricks, with natural finish timber cladding on the walls and a “smut-finished” clay Norfolk pantile roof.

English Heritage, which had objected to the original plan, has no objections to the revised application, which is 1.8m shorter.

A report to Thursday’s NNDC development committee, which will decide the plan, says the ridge height of the house would “only be approximately 2.8m above that of the (existing) bungalow”.

At 515 m sq, the floor area of the farmstead would be about 145 m sq larger than the bungalow which the report says would not be a disproportionately large increase in height or scale.

The report adds: “ is considered that this is a site which is capable of accommodating a contemporary-style dwelling for the 21st century, rather than a pastiche of the past.”

If the right materials were used to build it, the report says the house would not mar the AONB or harm the Glaven Valley Conservation Area, or other heritage assets, including the grade one-listed parish churches of Blakeney, Wiveton and Cley.

But Godfrey Sayers, chairman of Wiveton Parish Council, and the Glaven Valley Protection Group, formed as a result of the application, said the “enormous” building would be the second most conspicuous feature, after Wiveton Church, in the stunning view of the Glaven Valley conservation area from the east.

The 25-strong group was particularly worried about a precedent being set if the district council chose to “drive a coach and horses through its planning policies,” and approve the scheme.

Mr Sayers added: “We are not opposed to development on that site but the scale of this is outrageous.”

$element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value $element.shareHTML.html.value


  • Absolutely agree with you Canary! And Lockers makes excellent FACTUAL points. Most importantly though is hisher opening sentence. Councillors cannot be bullied by those who shout the loudest and almost always in highly emotive and incorrect or exaggerated terminology.

    Report this comment


    Thursday, September 4, 2014

  • The property should be ,like many others, subject to an agricultural restriction and the holding on which it is being built should be identified as being able to afford and sustain a house of the size applied for with no need for income from additional The farm should merit a house of the size and this should not be a non farmer buying some land in order to build a thumping great house where permission would not normally be granted. Farmers are often denied permission to build a home on the business while councils give permission for eyesore estates at random-so common sense is welcome. If the home is for the farm business then a precedent is already set and does not lead the way for non business homes to be built.

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Wednesday, September 3, 2014

  • What a fuss about nothing. If you look at the submitted plans it's clear a visitor to the area would probably not even notice the house unless it was pointed out. I suspect someone's just a little jealous.

    Report this comment

    Cyril the Canary

    Monday, September 1, 2014

  • Local democracy isn't about bending to those who shout loudest - usually those saying "No" when it comes to (major or minor, in the case minor) development. It's about voting for people who make the rules and then sticking to the rules once made. I have to confess I don't know the planning guidelines and rules in this area, but I would assume they are being adhered to. Having looked at the area on Googlemaps and I can see that having a building marginally taller than those that already there will make no difference at all! In fact a smartly designed and executed building will enhance what is already there! A vast building wouldn't be right - however from what I can see a slightly higher roofline won't make any difference at all - either nearby or from a distance Can't have everything set in aspic, people!

    Report this comment


    Monday, September 1, 2014

  • Local democracy means nothing. Planning officers go on blighting the landscape

    Report this comment


    Monday, September 1, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most Read

Featured Pages

Most Commented

Latest from the EDP

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 13°C

min temp: 9°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition


Enjoy the EDP
digital edition


Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter