Search

MoD told to ‘pull finger out’ over future of RAF Mildenhall

14:40 08 January 2016

RAF Mildenhall is due to close in four years.

RAF Mildenhall is due to close in four years.

One year on from the shock US Air Force announcement that it would leave RAF Mildenhall by 2022, the Ministry of Defence is being told to “pull its finger out” or risk damaging businesses and livelihoods in the region.

The MoD has been repeatedly asked to decide whether it has a future military use for the large base, with deadlines being pushed back again and again.

New figures put the economic benefit of the two bases in Suffolk at £700m a year, including RAF Lakenheath which is not closing.

Forest Heath District Council, together with west Suffolk partner St Edmundsbury Borough Council, is using the anniversary of the closure announcement to pile the pressure on the MoD.

James Waters, leader of Forest Heath council, said he expected a decision in the spring.

Previously he had hoped for mid-to-late 2015.

He said: “We are pushing the MoD to make a decision regarding any future military use for all or part of the RAF Mildenhall site. The council’s position is very clear. We want a commitment that the site will not be mothballed when the USAF leave – the potential damage of doing so is clear for all to see.”

At RAF Lakenheath, approximately 1,600 extra personnel in the form of two squadrons of F-35A jets will arrive in 2021. However, they are also relocating 350 personnel and two Pave Hawk helicopter rescue squadrons from Lakenheath to Italy.

The net loss of jobs will be nearly 3,000, who have many thousands more dependants such as spouses and children.

St Edmundsbury leader John Griffiths said: “We certainly benefit from the USAF in St Edmundsbury.

“The closure of RAF Mildenhall could have a serious impact on the economy in the borough as well as further afield. But there is also exciting opportunities to make something special out of the site.”

An MoD spokesman said: “This is a complex piece of work which has involved examining existing infrastructure and considering suitability for future use.”

3 comments

  • Turn it into the East Anglican International Airport. An hour from Lynn or Norwich, better accessible than Norwich airport for lots of people, relieves pressure on building a second runway at Stansted, already has the runways and infrastructure (just needs parking and passenger terminals), near dual carriageways so has good transport links. .. it's more likely to attract airlines than Norwich airport and would provide the economic injection that would be lost when the USAF moves on.

    Report this comment

    So_Many_Haters!

    Saturday, January 9, 2016

  • Why doesn't Suffolk council buy it? Every council should have one, ask Norfolk!

    Report this comment

    beverley

    Saturday, January 9, 2016

  • I'll bang the drum, again, for them to get on with building a new town. With realistic geographic links with the expanding Cambridge and lightening the pressure to build elsewhere surely this is a golden opportunity that shouldn't be missed. The new prosperity brought in would more than compensate for the loss of the USAF.

    Report this comment

    Green Ink from Tunbridge Wells

    Friday, January 8, 2016

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most Read

Featured Pages

Most Commented

Latest from the EDP

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 25°C

min temp: 15°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast
HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

cover

Enjoy the EDP
digital edition

Subscribe

Newsletter Sign Up