Erosion at Easton Bavents. Photo: Andy Darnell
By ANTHONY CARROLL
Thursday, January 20, 2011
3:42 PM
A groundbreaking policy to help beleaguered Suffolk homeowners who face losing their homes to coastal erosion is to be formalised next week.
On Wednesday, Waveney District Council is to set in stone a lands right move promise for people in Corton and Easton Bavents.
Once ratified, people who face losing their property to Mother Nature over the next 20 years can move to safe land nearby and still keep residential land use so they can build similar properties if they follow relevant planning law.
Businesses will also be able to relocate in similar arrangements.
In November, the England family, of the Retreat, Easton Bavents, were given early residential land transfer rights by the council after the erosion of metres of land threatened their chalet and mobile home.
Planners granted the Englands and eight other property owners permission as it was feared homes would be lost before Wednesday’s approval of the development management policy document.
The Englands, brother and sister Charles and Beth, hope to move into a new property by the autumn.
Their father, Paul, who lives in Strickland Place, Southwold, hoped other families in both villages would benefit from similar agreements in future. He said: “Because of the agreement we had the opportunity to be cavalier and relocate our properties. It accepts what we are all facing here in a very pragmatic way. I think the council deserves some applause for its efforts.”
The land rights transfer, one of the first nationally, is part of a new planning policy covering housing, tourism, employment, sustainable design and the environment.
The policy for Corton and Easton Bavents says: “Allowing replacement development to take place... is intended to assist in minimising the blighting effects resulting from the predictions of coastal erosion included in shoreline management plans.
“Proposals for the relocation and replacement of dwellings affected by coastal erosion will be permitted provided the dwelling is a permanent building and likely to be affected by erosion within 20 years of the date of the proposal.
“This is considered appropriate taking into account that it would be difficult to obtain a mortgage on a property likely to be affected by coastal erosion within this time frame and would be difficult to sell.”
Supporters of Scottish champions Celtic are in Norwich ahead of the Adam Drury testimonial game tonight.
2 comments
"Losing their property to Mother Nature" is not the case for our rapidly disappearing coastline. The prime cause is beach draw down due to the replacement demand of offshore aggregate dredging, whilst the second main cause is sea rise brought about by Global Warming. Both of these are entirely man made and decidely not natural. Mans exploitation is the cause. Man has the means to combat it, but fails to do so. Whilst most Councils object to the issue of licences to dredge sand and shingle off our coastline, Suffolk fails to do so. The consequences of such inaction are now apparent.
Report this comment
Pat Gowen - MARINET
Friday, January 21, 2011
This policy should be adopted by Essex and Norfolk as well as Lincolnshire. All councils have problems with increasing inundation by the eaterly currents effects on the coast line. NCC councillors futile attempt to sell of land for debt decrease was wrong, this land is needed for schemes like this. These 4 councils should also lobby for the Crown estates 365 dayannum dredging operation to stop, bar keeping harbour channels open, as it exacerbates this scouring of the coast.
Report this comment
ingo wagenknecht
Thursday, January 20, 2011