Ministers today claimed they had listened to public concerns about planning reforms when they publishing a final version of their new policy.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

There had been fears when the National Planning Policy Framework was published last July that it would make it much easier to build on countryside areas.

But speaking in the House of Commons planning minister Greg Clark said there would be “robust protections” for designated areas of countryside, such as green belt or the Norfolk Broads.

Meanwhile the government reinstated a requirement for planning authorities to recognise that undesignated areas of countryside also had “intrinsic value and beauty”.

Mr Clark said: “Our reforms to planning policy have three fundamental objectives. To put unprecedented power in the hands of communities to shape the places in which they live.

“To better support growth to give the next generation the chance that our generation has had to have a decent home, and to allow the jobs to be created on which our prosperity depends.

“And to ensure that the places we cherish – our countryside, towns and cities – are bequeathed to the next generation in a better condition than they are now.”

Campaigners had feared that a requirement that councils decide planning applications on a “presumption in favour of sustainable development” would allow developers to force through projects in spite of public opposition.

But Mr Clark said each planning authority area’s “local plan”, drawn up by the council in consultation with voters, would be the “keystone” to all planning decisions – dictating where development went.

Another change includes an explicit return to “brownfield first”, which requires councils to favour previously used land for new development instead of green field sites, and a clearer definition of “sustainable development”. The new policy will also favour town centre development.

Mr Clark said the changes would allow more homes to be built, which have been held up in part by the “sclerosis” of the planning system.

He said: “The framework guarantees robust protections for our natural and historic environment, and goes further by requiring net improvements to put right some of the neglect that has been visited on us.”

4 comments

  • Oh dear Greg - this is Norfolk, there is no 'consultation with local voters'.... what Derrick wants, Derrick gets and stuff everybody else!

    Report this comment

    User Removed

    Tuesday, March 27, 2012

  • Still wont stop garden grabbing which is out of control in Bradwell, Norfolk aided and abetted by the parish council

    Report this comment

    "V"

    Tuesday, March 27, 2012

  • Many developers will just look at the presumption in favour of development not sustainable development.The Coalition have not defined sustainability so until legal precedent is established Planning Committees are in a no win cleft stick.The Localism agenda is about to fall apart as a result.

    Report this comment

    Peter Watson

    Wednesday, March 28, 2012

  • What is most conveniently not mentioned is that it is still government policy to require councils to build large numbers of houses . i.e 37,000 houses in Norfolk over the next 15 years. Until this requirement is rescinded then we councils will have no option but to give the go ahead for large scale developments.

    Report this comment

    andy

    Tuesday, March 27, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 26°C

min temp: 18°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT