The cost of sending Norfolk’s looked after children to expensive out-of-county residential homes is on course to be slashed by nearly £150,000 a week by 2014.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The county council has so far managed to reduce the number of young people being sent across the border – and sometimes hundreds of miles away – from 68 in March 2010 to 48 at the beginning of this month.

Ongoing work to create new long and short term placements within Norfolk – part of a £5.4m investment announced earlier this year – means that number should be down to 20 by March 2014.

In 2010, the county council was spending more than £210,000 a week on out-of-county residential placements. That should be down to just under £62,000 by 2014.

With places outside of Norfolk costing £3,091 compared with £1,955 at a recently opened centre in the county, it is set to lead to millions of pounds worth of savings.

Alison Thomas, county council cabinet member for children’s services, said creating more residential placements within Norfolk also saved the authority money in terms of social workers’ time and expenses because fewer were having to travel long distances to carry out assessments.

“That one off investment will save us revenue costs year on year. In some cases we’re saving £1,500 to £2,000 a week,” Mrs Thomas said.

The efforts have been welcomed by children’s charities who believe moving youngsters far from home is an additional upheaval for young people who are already having a difficult time.

Tom Rahilly, head of the NSPCC’s looked-after children programme, said: “Placing children in care homes many miles from their homes is often a potentially damaging move as they can become isolated and face an increased rise of abuse.

“While there is obviously pressure on the care system we must ensure there are sufficient resources available to give the right level of stability, support and protection to these children who need it more than most.

“We therefore very much welcome the efforts being made in Norfolk to keep children close to the areas they have grown up in, providing much needed stability in their lives.”

Mrs Thomas said there was also a risk of lower standards when sending children to care homes in other local authority areas where social workers could not keep as close an eye on them as they would like.

She said: “The local authorities don’t have ownership of the children. They are not their children. There is less accountability.”

The creation of extra in-county places has included the building of a new six-bed residential home, which opened last summer and was instantly full, and two further homes proving a total of eight beds which will be up and running by next summer.

The county council has also been working with other providers to “spot purchase” rooms on a short-term basis when they are needed to prevent pupils being sent out of county.

Mrs Thomas stressed those children already in placements outside of Norfolk would only be moved back when it was in their best interests.

4 comments

  • Electra, no matter who is in Government, you are going to have 'looked after children'. They don't come and go like politicians! Nothing to do with "Tory administration". It is a large investment, but the long term aim must surely be that they come out of the system eventually and then contribute back to society.

    Report this comment

    Andy T

    Monday, January 7, 2013

  • I think we should know what the definition of "looked after" is. Are these kiddies with serious health issues that require massive medical care? In which case I fully sympathise. But if it is the usual chucking of money around willy nilly by the Tory administration at County then we need to know that too.

    Report this comment

    Electra

    Thursday, January 3, 2013

  • Do these spot purchases by NCC require that clients move frequently and how does this reflect on the quality of their life and care?

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Thursday, January 3, 2013

  • Apparently then £1955 a week is cheap to look after a child! It would be better to pay for them to spend the week full board at a spa resort somewhere and save even more money. £2000 a week is ridiculous

    Report this comment

    DaveG

    Friday, January 4, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Overcast

Overcast

max temp: 9°C

min temp: 10°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT