Academies commissioner will oversee schools that educate 10,000s of our children

Most Norfolk children will attend an academy at some point during their school life. Photo: Barry Batchelor/PA Wire Most Norfolk children will attend an academy at some point during their school life. Photo: Barry Batchelor/PA Wire

Thursday, August 7, 2014
6:31 AM

He may be the most important figure in education in our region for the next five years, with powers over schools which educate nearly two-thirds of Norfolk secondary school pupils.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Yet Tim Coulson was little known in Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire when the Department for Education appointed him as the civil servant who will oversee academies in our area.

Since taking up the post as the first regional schools commissioner for North East London and the East of England last month, Dr Coulson has visited academies across the patch to familiarise himself with local issues.

His role is a major one, as most Norfolk children will attend an academy during their school years.

By the end of the autumn term, more than 30,000 secondary school pupils in Norfolk will be studying at one, as well as 9,000 primary school pupils.

However, Dr Coulson said he also aimed to become a player across the wider education landscape, working with councils, dioceses and others to improve standards.

The structure of eight commissioners across England, under national commissioner Frank Green, was created to address concerns about the accountability of thousands of academies which, having moved out of the local authority realm, became directly answerable to Whitehall.

Dr Coulson, a former headteacher in Islington and, until last month, director of education at Essex County Council, said he has four main areas of responsibility:

• intervening in under-performing academies;

• approving applications for school to become academies;

• ensuring there are enough high-quality academy sponsors;

• approving major changes to existing academies.

The first role could see him make significant changes to academies with poor Ofsted reports or exam results, such as removing governing bodies, forcing schools to join an academy chain, or changing their sponsor.

The second will see him step into the world of non-academies, and some of the most controversial local decisions in education – the fate of non-academies that run into difficulty.

The third role will see him encourage top-performing schools and other organisations to become academy sponsors and bring others schools under their umbrella.

The fourth could see him decide issues such as whether an academy opens a sixth form.

Dr Coulson will be advised and held to account by a head teachers board, which includes four principals of top-rated academies, elected by headteachers of all academies in the region.

A total of 18 heads stood, including three from Norfolk, three from Suffolk and two from Cambridgeshire. Of the four elected, three were from Essex and one from Cambridgeshire.

But Dr Coulson said Norfolk and Suffolk would not be disadvantaged by a lack of representation, because one of the first priorities of the board would be “a couple of other appointments that the criteria will be a good working knowledge of Norfolk and Suffolk”.

The post is paid up to £140,000, and the National Union of Teachers has called the new system a “confusing, expensive and bureaucratic

arrangement of school accountability”.

It may not take long to see how Dr Coulson uses his powers, with this month’s exam results set to shine the spotlight on any under-performing academies.

Do you have an education story? Email martin.george@archant.co.uk

4 comments

  • ....". Competition between schools and privatisation are bound to damage education".....well the LEA would say that wouldn't they?

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Rhombus

    Thursday, August 7, 2014

  • Well said, Sportswagon. This is an admission that the "freedoms" of academies and "free" schools are leading to all sorts of problems. The programme is not the success which was claimed by Gove and, unfortunately, it will take years to undo the damage he has done. Competition between schools and privatisation are bound to damage education.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    jane

    Thursday, August 7, 2014

  • I hope the academy commission will hold academies to account in a more robust manner than the LEA did with their schools. Our LEA allowed failed schools, (often massively undersubscribed in pupils and oversubscribed with poor teaching) to drift along for years, depriving more energetic and successful schools of much needed funds.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Rhombus

    Thursday, August 7, 2014

  • A mini LA in all but name but expected to cover 7 LAs. This is a ludicrous, expensive, bureaucratic experiment appointed mostly to get high schools to become academy sponsors. In other other words the appeal of academy status has been so rejected by primary schools that high schools are now doing the DfE's dirty work. We should all be very worried since this will fail spectacularly.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Sportswagon

    Thursday, August 7, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Overcast

Overcast

max temp: 12°C

min temp: 11°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT