Fears axing A140 speed camera in north Suffolk could lead to more accidents

19:47 20 August 2012

The A140 speed camera at Brome

The A140 speed camera at Brome

Eastern Daily Press © 2004

Fears have been raised a decision to switch off a speed camera on a busy section of the A140 in north Suffolk could lead to an increase in the number of road accidents.

Janet Norman-Philips, clerk of Redlingfield Parish Council, has written to Joanna Spicer, chairman of Suffolk Police Authority, asking why the camera on the A140 at Brome has been switched off, describing the section of road covered by the camera as “lethal” and the decision to axe it as encouraging motorists to speed up.

On Monday, she told the EDP: “There have been deaths and serious injuries in crashes in this location, but clearly these deaths don’t count. From our point of view, traffic has sped up on that road since the cameras were cut out.”

The Roadside Board, the partnership between Suffolk County Council, police and other agencies, decided earlier this year to keep two cameras on the A12 at Benhall and A140 at Coddenham, but axe cameras on the A1144 at Normanston Drive, Lowestoft, London Road at Brandon, A1304 Hamilton Road at Newmarket and the A140 at Brome following a review into which cameras were most effective in reducing accidents.

The cameras were initially switched off last year after the county council pulled £1m of funding and the police decided they were too expensive for them to run.

However, the cameras were immediately switched on again pending the review into which cameras should remain operational.

In her letter, Ms Norman-Philips said she was concerned about the manner in which data was collected on accidents in areas covered by the cameras, which showed that at Brome there had only been one minor collision during the nine years since the camera was introduced.

She said the figures for the Brome camera covered a short distance then the statistics for other cameras and did not include two dangerous junctions just outside the 200m radius at Rectory Road, Brome and the B1077 “Devil’s Handbasin” where there had been a number of serious accidents, including fatal collisions.

However, councillor Keith Patience, Waveney district councillor for the Normanston area of Lowestoft, was slightly less concerned about the loss of the Normanston Drive camera because a nearby rail crossing caused traffic to build up, which helped to slow vehicles down.

He said the only problem was traffic pulling out of the Higher Drive junction and turning right, saying he would prefer traffic to have to turn left instead and go round the Peto Way roundabout before returning along Normanston Drive.

Reg Sylvester, chairman of Brandon Town Council, cited similar reasons for not opposing the axing of the London Road camera in Brandon because heavy traffic on that stretch of road helped to regulate drivers’ speeds.

He added: “It has never been a bad place for accidents. My concern there is that the camera could have been better used elsewhere in the town, such as Crown Street or Thetford Road.”

Joanna Spicer, the police authority’s chairman, said: “All speed enforcement in the county will be discussed at Suffolk County Council’s next Road Safety Partnership meeting in September and the outcome will be fed into a review of the county’s speed camera arrangements, which is being carried out by the constabulary later in the year. The concerns of Redlingfield Parish Council will be considered as part of this review.”

She said reducing speeding was still a main priority for the police.


  • Working close by, I drive past this camera on numerous occasions each week. I have to say, I have seen no difference in drivers' behaviour since the camera was turned off, and I certainly don't feel less safe since the switch off. If the clerk claims this stretch of road is lethal, I suggest it has nothing to do with speed along the A140, but more to do with drivers 'chancing their luck' pulling out of the Brome junction on one side and the Devil's Handbasin on the other, often through frustration of having to wait for a safe gap. I'd like to know what evidence she has to say traffic has sped up. Those who make a habit of speeding along the A140, always slowed down when they reached the camera and then rapidly accelerated once they were out of range, which, in many respects was even more dangerous. Sorry Janet, but I think your argument is completely flawed.

    Report this comment


    Tuesday, August 21, 2012

  • Announcing the fact that the camera is to be switched of will nullify it's deterrent effect. Leave well alone and it will remain a deterrent but not a money raiser. Though is money raising the main reason for it's presence!

    Report this comment


    Friday, August 24, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Latest from the EDP

Most Read

Featured Pages

Most Commented



max temp: 14°C

min temp: 10°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition


Enjoy the EDP
digital edition


Newsletter Sign Up