Flooding off Newport Road, Hemsby, in March 2013.
Sam Russell
Friday, March 15, 2013
3:52 PM
This is the site where planning councillors ruled nine affordable homes can be built.
Flooding in Newport Road, Hemsby, in September 2006.Permission for the homes at Newport Road, Hemsby was granted on February 19, and less than a month later the site was under water.
Residents say the street was previously flooded in 2006, with thousands of pounds of damage caused and months of disruption.
But despite warnings, a majority of councillors on Great Yarmouth Borough Council’s development control committee ignored these fears.
Rural Tory councillors who objected said Labour councillors voted along party lines to pass the plans - though there is no party whip for planning.
And residents are mourning the fact that the application was approved.
Peggy Sutton, 67, lives a stone’s throw from where the affordable homes will be built, and remembers flooding in September 2006.
“My husband said I was like Canute, trying to hold the water back,” she said. “It was horrid, when it invades your home.
“The whole bottom floor had to be replaced, all the skirting boards and carpets and furniture that was damaged.”
She added the ground floor was uninhabitable for five months, and that the proposed development site is even lower down than her home.
And she sighed: “They won’t listen.”
George Jermany, Conservative councillor for East Flegg ward, voted against the application and warned councillors of flood risk.
“It’s in the wrong place,” he said. “The exact spot where this development is going to be is in the point where all the fields meet together at the bottom of a slight incline, and oh boy do it flood.
“I use that road so regular it’s unbelievable and we know it exactly, but when it was put through it wasn’t taken into account.”
He added two other sites were available but passed over and the situation is regrettable, but said “the bottom line is it’s passed and it’s going to happen”.
Shirley Weymouth, Tory councillor for East Flegg, was the only Tory councillor to vote for building the homes on the land that is now under water.
She said: “I’ve got no regrets and I’m pleased that the scheme is going ahead.
“It will resolve any water issues in the area as they will be doing a drainage scheme.”
She added the social housing is much needed.
Labour planning chairman Mick Castle said last weekend’s flooding at the site is “not particularly relevant” as other places were hit too.
He said: “When the planning application was dealt with it certainly wasn’t felt there was a major problem, otherwise we would have included that with our response.”
The applicant behind the nine home affordable housing development is Orwell Housing Association, which has its headquarters in Ipswich.
Wendy Evans-Hendrick, director of development and property services, said: “In terms of any new development, we would carry out a flood risk assessment and within that there will be designed measures to mitigate against that [flood risk].”
Police in Norwich have launched an investigation after a woman claimed in a tweet she had knocked a cyclist off their bike.
ADVERTISEMENT
5 comments
There are two reasons for knowing not to pass planning permission to build houses in a flood area. One is expert knowledge gleaned from years of study and work in that area and the other is being a local who flaming well knows that certain areas just have to have a light sprinkling and they are duck ponds. The local councillors are certainly not the first but one would have hoped they qualified as local people with eyes. But it would seem not. I see developments going on all the time that are clearly being built on flood plains (the vegetation is that which only grows where the land is permanently marshy). I think wes1975 is right. We must look for other reasons why these people are happy to make out to the public that they are extraordinarily stupid. I guess brown envelopes do that to you.
Report this comment
Electra
Sunday, March 17, 2013
It's way past time these planning committees started to look at the infrastructure when giving the go ahead for any building, it would seem that they are passing virtually anything without any thought for the future. They are at best inept and at worst absolutely flaming useless.
Report this comment
Joe Mullets Uncle
Saturday, March 16, 2013
"He said: “When the planning application was dealt with it certainly wasn’t felt there was a major problem, otherwise we would have included that with our response.” Depends how thick the brown envelopes were, doesnt it ?.
Report this comment
"V"
Friday, March 15, 2013
The councillors who voted this through are utterly deluded or have other reasons for doing so. I think that we all can guess why but are not allowed to say it publically. Oh that reminds me, I need some brown envelopes and have to get some cash out of the bank today......
Report this comment
wes1975
Friday, March 15, 2013
Just goes to prove that the councillors need to learn or seek better advice about planning ... With all the rainfall the past 5 years and likely in the future... Perhaps councillors need to be more knowledgeable in their actions about the ground approved for housing... The days of a wink and a nod... Are long gone... They make enough mistakes as it is... Without making anymore... Wise up councillors if unsure seek professional advice... Not guess work...
Report this comment
Lionel
Friday, March 15, 2013