Bold new vision for south Lowestoft unveiled

BEFORE: The Jeld Wen site close to Riverside Road Kirkley Waterfront   Picture: James Bass BEFORE: The Jeld Wen site close to Riverside Road Kirkley Waterfront Picture: James Bass

Saturday, January 11, 2014
6:57 AM

Up to 850 homes, a new primary school, a marina and retail developments have been unveiled as part of ambitious plans for south Lowestoft.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

AFTER: Futuristic homes on stilts living accommodation, in the architects view of the development. Picture: ASSAEL ARCHITECTUREAFTER: Futuristic homes on stilts living accommodation, in the architects view of the development. Picture: ASSAEL ARCHITECTURE

A long-term vision to regenerate under-used or vacant land on the south side of Lake Lothing with “unique” homes on stilts, waterfront villas, cafès, a wildlife visitor centre and a new public park have been included in the plans.

And, as these images show, the vision is to transform more than 45 acres (18.3 hectares) into a “vibrant, sustainable community” that would aim to build on “the area’s unique maritime setting”.

A planning application has now been submitted to Waveney District Council by Cardy Construction Ltd, which has been working with London-based architects and agents in Norwich.

It says the scheme will not only transform the development sites off Waveney Drive – which were once home to the Brooke Marine boatbuilding business and the Jeld Wen joinery factory – but provide jobs and act as “the catalyst for future investment in the town.” Old industrial buildings would be knocked down as part of the redevelopment.

AFTER: An architects view of how the Lake Lothing waterfront may look in the development. Picture: ASSAEL ARCHITECTUREAFTER: An architects view of how the Lake Lothing waterfront may look in the development. Picture: ASSAEL ARCHITECTURE

Waveney MP Peter Aldous said: “I welcome the submission of this planning application with proposals to bring back into full use an important area in Lowestoft.”

Waveney District Council leader Colin Law also welcomed the plans.

“This proposal is a wonderful shot in the arm for Lowestoft and promises much needed affordable housing, jobs and a genuine attraction for visitors,” he said. “The Area Action Plan was created to help deliver landmark developments like this and we are now beginning to see the fruits of our labours.

“I have always said how committed I am to transforming Lowestoft and creating real benefits for all,” he added. “It is a town to be proud of and this is another step forward on what we hope will be a fantastic journey for our communities.”

The leader of Waveney’s opposition Labour group, Tod Sullivan, said: “I welcome the investment in the town, new affordable homes are vital. Although I believe parts of the overall planning strategy for Waveney need revising and reviewing, I have always supported the principle of regenerating the waterfront for homes and for business use.”

However, the proposals have also prompted a number of critical comments and objections, from the Excelsior Trust charity and numerous locals, with one resident suggesting the plan “is totally unethical” and another adding the development “is beyond moral decency.”

The application, which is currently waiting for consideration by Waveney, has also prompted concerns about potential flooding in light of the recent tidal surge.

A spokesman for the developers said they had addressed concerns raised by the Environment Agency and the highways department over “the potential for flooding and the traffic impact” on the wider area.

If the scheme wins approval, the spokesman said, “we would expect work to commence during this year and to provide a considerable number of jobs both during and after construction for many years to come, as well as being the catalyst for future investment in the town.”

2 comments

  • Why is Lowestoft not Corton? Why is Great Yarmouth not Hopton? The reason is quite simply because two of those towns are ports and two are not. By removing port and water employment activities and filling the area with houses and shops, the reason for LowestoftOulton Broad ceases to exist. Surely any waterfront site should be used for industry and port related activities? Then there are jobs and the need for low cost housing is reduced. EVERYONE benefits. We do not know what will happen in the future with regard to the port and fishing etc but waterside areas MUST be used for boat building; boat repairs; tourism and leisure activities, maybe support boats for fish-farming that might occur around the wind-farms offshore. Who knows what else? To deny the county the opportunity to use the resource by stuffing the area with houses is short-sighted and foolish. I want my children and grand-children to have the opportunity to work; not live in subsidized low-cost housing.

    Report this comment

    East Anglian Man

    Tuesday, January 14, 2014

  • Those artists impressions are missing one things....flying pigs...as if any of this wishful thinking will ever come to anything...its Lowestoft, its a dump filled with the dregs of society who won't appreciate such facilities...investors know this and this type of project simply won't get off the ground...still, it fills a page I suppose and stops the journalists from actually doing some REAL work...afterall, publishing a press release is far less onerous than leaving ones desk...

    Report this comment

    merrydancer

    Saturday, January 11, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Norfolk Weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 19°C

min temp: 14°C

Five-day forecast

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT