Fuelling the debate about diesel

06:41 30 August 2014

Tim Holden looks at a dilemma about diesel.

Tim Holden looks at a dilemma about diesel.

Archant 2011 0

Tim Holden, chief executive of Holden Group, breaks his holiday resolution to look at a diesel dilemma.

One of the things I like about a holiday is not keeping up to date with current affairs. Switching the smartphone off, not going near a TV or a newspaper and forgetting the rest of the world exists.

This year I made a holiday resolution to carry on in blissful ignorance as long as I could. I managed 14 hours before, in the supermarket buying all the things we had managed to eat before we left, I saw in the Daily Telegraph:

Diesel drivers to be penalised in drive to cut air pollution

Despite my resolution, I knew I would have to find out what that was all about.

In short, diesels, now the majority of the UK population own one, are suddenly evil and must be eradicated. According to some anyway, notably Boris Johnson, because they emit nitrous oxide which isn’t good for you when you inhale it.

The government introduced the current vehicle excise duty in 2001, bringing the UK in line with Europe, with the main criteria CO2 emissions. CO2 is bad for the ozone layer and, as a consequence, all of humanity. The more your car emits, the more you pay. Environmental box: ticked.

Car-makers delivered huge increases in fuel economy and big cuts in CO2. Diesel engines perform better than petrol so, inadvertently, the government’s focus on CO2 incentivised the production and sales of diesel cars. Looking at every car (excluding electric) we sell at Holdens, average fuel economy and road tax is 73.1mpg and just £14.57. Consequently, most people are buying diesel.

Seeing as 59% of the diesel pump price is tax, such gains on both fronts must have led to a large drop in tax revenue to the Treasury? Ahem.

Another benefit of diesel engines is they reach their most efficient operating temperature in about half the time of a petrol unit so emit less carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and lead – none of which should be inhaled – than petrol. It’s an advantage in urban areas where most vehicles are but, unfortunately for diesel, you get more nitrous oxide and particulates.

So which is better? I have no idea. I think I preferred being in blissful ignorance on the whole subject. My conclusion is a new modern car – diesel or petrol – is considerably kinder to the environment than your current five-year-old motor.

I would say that, wouldn’t I? I have a holiday to pay for!

Tim Holden is chief executive of Holden Group.


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Eastern Daily Press visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Eastern Daily Press staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Eastern Daily Press account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Live Traffic Map

Motoring supplements

Drive24 Cover


max temp: 10°C

min temp: 5°C

Motors Jobs

Show Job Lists

Meet the Editor

Andy Russell

Andy Russell

Email | Twitter

EDP motoring editor, journalist who loves wheels and engines but hates cleaning them.

Most Read