EDF Energy urged to give more people a chance to have their say on Sizewell C nuclear power station proposals

PUBLISHED: 13:27 24 October 2012 | UPDATED: 14:41 24 October 2012

If given the go-ahead, Sizewell C will be built next to Sizewell B

If given the go-ahead, Sizewell C will be built next to Sizewell B


Two councils in Suffolk have called on EDF Energy to widen its proposed public consultation on plans for the Sizewell C development on the north Suffolk coast.

The request from Suffolk Coastal District Council and Suffolk County Council is in response to a draft document EDF sent out last month on how it intends to proceed with its consultation. Called a Statement of Community Consultation (SoCC), the document outlines how EDF would inform and involve the public in its proposals to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell.

The formal consultation is planned to start by the end of November, marking the first stage of the planning process.

The chairman of the Sizewell Joint Local Authorities Group, county councillor Guy McGregor, said: “Overall the draft SoCC is quite comprehensive, but there are one or two major improvements we would like to see.

“In particular, we think the proposed eight-week phase one consultation period is far too short, particularly as it would fall over the Christmas period.

“It should be a minimum of 12 weeks to give the public, our two councils and the many town and parish councils affected, enough time to respond to all the implications of a the proposed Sizewell C.”

Mr McGregor added that he would also like to see the proposed consultation zone extended to take in communities “who may be affected by the wider transport, environment and socio-economic impacts any new development at Sizewell might have.”

EDF’s communications manager for the Sizewell C project Tom McGarry said: “We are pleased to confirm that we have received the local authorities’ response to our draft Statement of Community Consultation. We are currently considering their feedback.”

Search hundreds of local jobs at Jobs24

1 comment

  • What Britain needs,if at all, is a molten salt reactor which runs on nuclear waste from the other plants. But that would mean denying bomb makes the plutonium they craze for and arms manufacturers their urge to harden ammunitions and missiles with depleted uranium. These nuclear tipped ammunitions have cause cancer levels in areas were these munitions were used, whether it was in Iraq or in the Gulf war. Come to think of it,our children really cannot afford the legacies and risks of nuclear power, after Chernobyl and Fukushima we should have learned our lesson and use the abundant alternative power sources available here in Britain.

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Comments have been disabled on this article.

Latest from the EDP

Show Job Lists

Most Read

Featured Pages

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 19°C

min temp: 12°C

Listen to the latest weather forecast

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to the following newsletters:

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter