December 21 2014 Latest news:
Saturday, April 7, 2012
David Cameron has just announced the possible creation of new “garden cities” as a further initiative to help meet the housing crisis. While welcoming this initiative, since they have become popular places to live, I am baffled why we are not encouraging a much more popular settlement type – the village.
This is the foundation from which all larger settlements spring and has been neglected in favour of cities and anodyne housing estates cut off from any sense of place or community.
Villages, when working as they should, allow for cohesive communities and a strong sense of belonging, yet our current planning policies strangulate their growth and prevent them from being vital places to live. They are needed for more choice and diversity in living.
Historically, villages have been associated with agricultural communities, but this relationship has significantly changed in post-industrial western economies. Increasingly impoverished during the Industrial Revolution by people moving to cities, the 20th century has exacerbated the village’s plight with the decimation of agricultural employment.
Only 1pc of the workforce is now employed in agriculture – it is absurd to kid ourselves this is the mainstay of village life however it is portrayed in The Archers. Planning policies still have not recognised this, allowing new houses related only to agricultural employment.
But the problem is deeper – alongside policies preventing villages growing organically, market forces have turned attractive villages into wealthy people’s second-home ghettos – pricing others out of the market and reducing demand for local shops, pubs and public transport.
So how do we reverse this decline? Local planning policies must adapt to the needs of the 21st century village since it has been grossly undervalued as a place for growth. Whether the new National Policy Framework encourages this remains to be seen.
Equally important is internet and fast broadband – which the EDP has campaigned for – so small businesses can grow and prosper in villages.
It is here we should build small office units rather than having them stranded on forlorn industrial sites with no access to shops or people. How much better if they are part of a village, supporting the local economy, sitting alongside home-working which is part of our daily lives.
Shops would re-establish themselves as the backbones of the community and with affordable housing and holiday homes limited in numbers a sustainable community could be achieved. Switzerland is introducing a policy limiting second homes to 20pc in attractive alpine villages.
Where villages have been allowed to grow and properly function they are thriving. Horsford is a proper functioning village combining small businesses, homes, shops, football club, community hall and school. It is a popular place to live with a growing population. It presents an attractive alternative to towns that have dominated our attention during the industrial epoch – that has well and truly passed.
Question marks surround the fate of several development projects in and around King’s Lynn after the developers behind the project went into administration.