A grudging acceptance of Europe’s reforms to the Common Agricultural Policy may be emerging, said Euro MP and Norfolk farmer Stuart Agnew.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

He detected signs that two key groups dominating the European parliament’s agriculture and rural development committee have been reached compromises.

A crunch meeting of the agriculture committee on Tuesday, January 22 could lead the way to the next phase of the reform process, he added.

West Norfolk poultry and arable farmer Mr Agnew, who was elected in 2009, said 7,500 amendments had been made to the CAP reform proposals.

In a 70-minute briefing to members of Holt & District Farmers’ Club, he said that there was increasing recognition by leaders of this influential committee that they must make a formal response. As a member of the 44-strong committee, Ukip’s Mr Agnew was one of just eight regular attenders with detailed agricultural knowledge.

There were seven political groups and one or two independents on the committee, which made the decision-making even more challenging.

And faced with so many amendments, it had rather blown the system. “Never before in the history of the EU have they had 7,500 amendments. They can’t cope with that – they all have to be voted on and agreed. So what normally happens is that they seek compromises.

Mr Agnew, who is a former chairman of Norfolk National Farmers’ Union, said that the two biggest groups - the left of centre EPP (European People’s Party) had the most members, then the socialists. “If these two agree on a compromise amendment, they will outvote everyone else on the committee.”

“This reform process has been stuttering and lumbering along. There have been serious objections to the ‘greening’ measures as completely impractical,” he said.

Part of the problem was simply the sheer size of the EU, which stretched from 200 miles north of the Arctic Circle to the bottom corner of Cyprus and from 500hp tractors to draught oxen – all of these have to have an a common agricultural policy. It is getting more and more difficult to find one that will fit the bill.”

“They’ve had problems in getting compromises. Until the turn of the year, it looked as if there would not be a compromise. There had been an internal split in both groups, on a geographical basis - north and west and south and east on the other.

The ‘north” contributes more while the south and east are net recipients. For us, for every £1 we pay, we get 50p back, he said.

However, a leading member of the EPP, Irish MEP Mairead McGuinness, seemed to indicate at the recent Oxford Farming Conference that a compromise agreement could be reached. “She would know because she is the second most senior member of the EPP on the committee.”

“If the parliament fails, then what’s the point in having it,” said Mr Agnew. And if the committee failed to respond, it would bypass the parliament. It would revert to the old system and the EU Commission and Farm Council would seal a deal.

“There’s a consensus that it must be settled to maintain the parliament’s credibility,” he added.

Mr Agnew said Ukip’s approach, as a member of the minority opposition, was to look at the proposed amendments with one test in mind - Will it benefit the British farmer? And will it benefit the UK taxpayer?

2 comments

  • As MEPs who oppose their countries' membership of the EU are few, it would not be a good idea for UKIP's Stuart Agnew to resign over this. He cannot personally guarentee we will leave the EU tomorrow, so he has been struggling to improve the CAP in his country's interests while he remains in the job. If UKIP members could choose how the public vote we would prefer that we would have MPs in Westminster rather than MEP's in Brussels, but no matter whether a UKIP local councillor, MP or MEP, all do their utmost towards forcing an referendum on the EU in order to get us out. At least with MEPs in the EU like Mr Agnew, the realities of the placeand the extent of its power can be more likely to be understood and appreciated by the public.

    Report this comment

    Charlotte Bull

    Monday, January 14, 2013

  • Seeing his UKIP ideals of leaving the EU, and turning away from EU subsidies that distort world trade, disappearing, Mr. Agnew now is lamenting about the uselessness of political blocks in the EU. If he feels so strongly why does he not resign andor encourage the UK Government to leave the EU. IF there is no change to the structure of the unelected Commission and or EU tax structure, the EU will lumber along as it is. Its the lack of will that has marked Britain's lack of participation in the EU, whilst it is perfectly fine with earning some 380+ billion each year from EU countries. The failed EU agenda relied and demanded a vested interest commission , banking directions and constant enlargement. It not the voters that failed but those who set out the parameters of influences in the EU, by sitting on the fence and taking the money.

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Saturday, January 12, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most read business stories

The Boathouse next to Ormesby Broad.
Michael and Belinda Minors.

Picture: James Bass

£2m investment realises Broads business dream

A Norfolk businessman has realised his dream of creating a paradise wedding venue and destination pub/restaurant in the heart of the Broads.

Read full story »

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT