To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The Governor of the Bank of England, Sir Mervyn King, strikes me as an avuncular cove, a chap possessing a patrician air, completely shorn of airs and graces. He’s a man who enjoys his cricket (he’s a patron of Worcestershire CC) and, as he approaches retirement in June, is probably looking forward to spending a little more time gracing cricket grounds across the globe.

His professional life, working as an economist, is rightly considered a huge success. Few become visiting professors at MIT and Harvard, while even fewer are capable of holding down an LSE economics professorship.

So it was disappointing to read Sir Mervyn’s recent comments in response to questions regarding the likelihood of our already bailed-out banks requiring even more money, up to £30 billion according to one MP.

“The sad truth is,” said Sir Mervyn, “in 2008, the idea of focusing efforts on recapitalising the banking system was a UK idea. We got there first but, like many UK ideas, the Americans developed it faster and better.”

Unfortunately, this comment is best interpreted as: “the Government was guilty of commercial naivety on an industrial scale.”

While Bank of England officials were warning recently that RBS and Lloyds (respectively 82% and 41% taxpayer-owned) had until March to shore up their balance sheets by tens of billions, so the painful truth regarding the original bank bailout finally emerged.

It was what might be called British banking’s ‘Lance Armstrong Moment’.

You see, regulators have admitted that the Government massively overpaid when coming to the bank’s rescue in 2008. Furthermore, they have finally revealed that taxpayers (for it’s our money, dear reader) will not only never make any profit from saving the banks, they’re unlikely to even cover the cost of the initial investment.

By contrast, the US government has made average returns of 15% for saving their banks from imminent collapse. How did this happen?

As Sir Mervyn highlighted, the Americans looked at what Gordon Brown’s government had done in respect of banking recapitalisation and immediately recognised Britain’s enormous mistake.

Unlike the situation in the UK, American officials insisted that all major banks must accept state money – Uncle Sam then bought banking stock at around half its book value. It has already sold most of those stakes and trousered a 15% profit.

By contrast, the Brown government paid around double the book value for its shares in just three banks, which also happened to be the worst affected, RBS, Lloyds and HBOS. The latter of this toxic trio was effectively bust when Lloyds reluctantly took it over. The current share prices of RBS and Lloyds remain well below what we, the taxpayer, paid for them.

On top of this, investors face further anguish as both banks will probably need to sell part of their operations to reinforce their respective balance sheets.

Meanwhile, the ‘Funding for Lending Scheme’, established to provide banks with cheap taxpayer-backed funding to be used for lending to house buyers and small businesses, has also come under fire as the benefits of cheaper money do not appear to be getting passed on in full.

As Sir Mervyn slips into ‘demob happy’ mode, it’s a pity his legacy will likely be determined by a group of senior politicians who did not have an ounce of commercial nous between them. Whether matters have improved since 2008 is open to debate.


  • With regard to the last paragraph of the article, Gordon Brown has gone AWOL and Ed Balls is still spouting the same nonsense to anyone who will listen to him!! If we are going to pursue errant bankers - which we should - we should also pursue those two.

    Report this comment


    Friday, January 25, 2013

  • Why do journalists refer to the Britsih banks being bailed out when in fact it was only two of them? And it is not all banks that may need further bail outs, only two of them! It was Gordon Brown's disastrous inteference that persuaded Lloyds to take over HBOS which compounded the problem because Lloyds was ok up until that moment. The even bigger problem for the UK and others has been the tax and borrow policies carried out on a gigantic scale by governments that are responsible for much of our problems. It was Brown, aided and abetted by Ed Balls, who left the enormous deficit which is still around our necks. I am not a conservative voter - merely someone who can see past the spin of our politicians who want to blame others for their errors.

    Report this comment


    Friday, January 25, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site



Most read business stories

Gunsmith, Philip Webster, at his business at Wymondham. Picture: DENISE BRADLEY

Norfolk gunsmith aims high as customers get younger

A Norfolk gunsmith is targeting his business at a younger generation of shooters as he looks to bring an old trade into the modern world.

Read full story »